Hi
I just wondered if anyone on this site has had a SGA (small for gestational age) baby at term, or even just experience of quite late gestation SGA baby?
My sister just had a little lad at 39 weeks (induced) who was only 4 lbs 7 oz (2000g), and is following the -3 to -2 centile he was born on. He was symmetrical, so head, abdomen, length and weight all on this centile.
We don't know why he was born SGA, as yet the Dr's have even to admit it to my sister or do any investigations... !!
He is now 7 weeks and breastfeeding OK - putting on 6-7oz week, with a fair amount of regurg, feeding 3 hourly. His head has moved up a centile and almost on the 0.4 one now which we are all taking as a good thing : ).
Exhausting with the frequency of breast feeding but my sister is doing amazingly well - she lets him go 4 hourly overnight now: ))
We are obviously all a bit concerned, especially since he was 'term' and so the HV, Paeds etc seem determined to class him as a normal term baby, but he was really undernourished when born and definitely has had IUGR (intra uterine growth restriction).
We have had to fight to get his length measured (even though this is recommended by new WHO growth charts (we have sourced the new low birthweight WHO chart for him, brilliant as we can now 'see' growth of his head, which otherwise wouldn't have - sourced from Harlow Healthcare if anyone else interested..). The Child Growth Foundation also provides a measurement chart which lists length measurement as being required for best any small babies (apparently however my sister has been told that due to new local guidelines Buckinghamshire 'doesn't do' lengths anymore (!)- so he had none done at birth either : (.
We have also had to fight for him to receive iron supplements - even though they are recommended by WHO for his birth weight even though born at term.
It seems a very poorly managed area within the NHS this category of baby.
He has a lot in common with later prem babies, obviously he is not in the category of a lot of your very early babies, but he has same problems with nutritional micro nutrient deficiencies etc as babies born similar weights, when weight appropriate for gestational age due to lack of chance to stock up adequately in the third trimester- but these do not seem to be recognised although the research is out there, as he missed NICU by a whisper.
We would as a family really appreciate hearing from anyone else who has experienced a similar situation.
We absolutely adore the little man, and he is proving a tough little cookie even though he has had a bit of a rough start to life.
Suddenly we understand a whole lot more about 'small' babies... EVERYONE should know more, it is an education and a half. I am only surprised as a Mum myself that I had so little knowledge before..
Much love to all, we are all in the same situation one way or another x x
I just wondered if anyone on this site has had a SGA (small for gestational age) baby at term, or even just experience of quite late gestation SGA baby?
My sister just had a little lad at 39 weeks (induced) who was only 4 lbs 7 oz (2000g), and is following the -3 to -2 centile he was born on. He was symmetrical, so head, abdomen, length and weight all on this centile.
We don't know why he was born SGA, as yet the Dr's have even to admit it to my sister or do any investigations... !!
He is now 7 weeks and breastfeeding OK - putting on 6-7oz week, with a fair amount of regurg, feeding 3 hourly. His head has moved up a centile and almost on the 0.4 one now which we are all taking as a good thing : ).
Exhausting with the frequency of breast feeding but my sister is doing amazingly well - she lets him go 4 hourly overnight now: ))
We are obviously all a bit concerned, especially since he was 'term' and so the HV, Paeds etc seem determined to class him as a normal term baby, but he was really undernourished when born and definitely has had IUGR (intra uterine growth restriction).
We have had to fight to get his length measured (even though this is recommended by new WHO growth charts (we have sourced the new low birthweight WHO chart for him, brilliant as we can now 'see' growth of his head, which otherwise wouldn't have - sourced from Harlow Healthcare if anyone else interested..). The Child Growth Foundation also provides a measurement chart which lists length measurement as being required for best any small babies (apparently however my sister has been told that due to new local guidelines Buckinghamshire 'doesn't do' lengths anymore (!)- so he had none done at birth either : (.
We have also had to fight for him to receive iron supplements - even though they are recommended by WHO for his birth weight even though born at term.
It seems a very poorly managed area within the NHS this category of baby.
He has a lot in common with later prem babies, obviously he is not in the category of a lot of your very early babies, but he has same problems with nutritional micro nutrient deficiencies etc as babies born similar weights, when weight appropriate for gestational age due to lack of chance to stock up adequately in the third trimester- but these do not seem to be recognised although the research is out there, as he missed NICU by a whisper.
We would as a family really appreciate hearing from anyone else who has experienced a similar situation.
We absolutely adore the little man, and he is proving a tough little cookie even though he has had a bit of a rough start to life.
Suddenly we understand a whole lot more about 'small' babies... EVERYONE should know more, it is an education and a half. I am only surprised as a Mum myself that I had so little knowledge before..
Much love to all, we are all in the same situation one way or another x x