Hi everyone,
Had an extra scan yesterday to check on baby's septated cystic hygroma - so far so good. But I noticed on the notes afterwards that baby has a short femur length when compared to abdominal circumference and head circumference, and find this a bit strange...
I'm naturally still a bit on edge as we're still waiting to have the heart scan to rule out any defects, and the main anatomy scan to rule out neural tube defects and things like skeletal dysplasia - all of which have soft markers such as the cystic hygroma that baby has.
Has anyone experienced this before? My daughter was the in the higher centiles for HC, AC and FL, and me and DH are both tall.
Measurements in picture. I worked out the FL/AC ratio to be 17.5%, and the FL/HC ratio to be 14.5%.
Xxx
Had an extra scan yesterday to check on baby's septated cystic hygroma - so far so good. But I noticed on the notes afterwards that baby has a short femur length when compared to abdominal circumference and head circumference, and find this a bit strange...
I'm naturally still a bit on edge as we're still waiting to have the heart scan to rule out any defects, and the main anatomy scan to rule out neural tube defects and things like skeletal dysplasia - all of which have soft markers such as the cystic hygroma that baby has.
Has anyone experienced this before? My daughter was the in the higher centiles for HC, AC and FL, and me and DH are both tall.
Measurements in picture. I worked out the FL/AC ratio to be 17.5%, and the FL/HC ratio to be 14.5%.
Xxx