Floyderin
So I miscarried 6th may this year.. Kept bleeding for three weeks and positive pregnancy test after three weeks too... Went to emergency and they saw leftovers both times both emergency appointments...
Still refusing to give me surgery to remove the leftover tissue and last time the dr (in fact not a fully dr yet but had to talk to a real dr before giving me advice, this at the emergency clinic for women in Sweden) said the leftovers is so little they wouldn't have anything to suck out if opting for surgery... Still she said to go back if still bleeding on June 8th or still have a positive pregnancy test at June 8th.
Find it a bit weird, why would I go back there if they can't give me the surgery anyway?
Seems like they are lying to me saying surgery is worthless to save resources.
The dr says new research says it's better for the body to expel the leftover tissue by itself with the next coming period.
I think this sound very risky but they refuse me to give me surgery and after all it's the only place here I can turn to as it's the public clinics performing this and they would read my journal stating I'm being denied the tissue removal surgery.
Has anyone ever heard of this? I'm terrified to get sterile because they want to save money on denying tissue removal.
Just simply terrified and hate being the victim of resource down cuts.
So I miscarried 6th may this year.. Kept bleeding for three weeks and positive pregnancy test after three weeks too... Went to emergency and they saw leftovers both times both emergency appointments...
Still refusing to give me surgery to remove the leftover tissue and last time the dr (in fact not a fully dr yet but had to talk to a real dr before giving me advice, this at the emergency clinic for women in Sweden) said the leftovers is so little they wouldn't have anything to suck out if opting for surgery... Still she said to go back if still bleeding on June 8th or still have a positive pregnancy test at June 8th.
Find it a bit weird, why would I go back there if they can't give me the surgery anyway?
Seems like they are lying to me saying surgery is worthless to save resources.
The dr says new research says it's better for the body to expel the leftover tissue by itself with the next coming period.
I think this sound very risky but they refuse me to give me surgery and after all it's the only place here I can turn to as it's the public clinics performing this and they would read my journal stating I'm being denied the tissue removal surgery.
Has anyone ever heard of this? I'm terrified to get sterile because they want to save money on denying tissue removal.
Just simply terrified and hate being the victim of resource down cuts.