I agree that it's not a true "freebirth" if medical assistance is present in any way. It's more like a pseudo free birth.
In its most basic sense, unassisted childbirth means giving birth at home without the aid of doctors or midwives
I was in the documentary you watched- Outlaw Births. My ex partner Clair is the british one who gave birth at home with just me there and I caught our son.
I was in the documentary you watched- Outlaw Births. My ex partner Clair is the british one who gave birth at home with just me there and I caught our son.
I saw your bit! I remember her shouting "I'm scared, I'm scared" and then the pure happiness on her face afterwards when she realised she'd done it.
Must have taken guts on your half, lots of responsibilty incase anything did happen to go wrong!
Your status says you're pregnant now - would you consider it for this birth or any future ones?x
Thanks! I've got a heart condition so even a homebirth isn't a possibility for me- however i've got to say I wouldn't do it! That seems hypocritical, I know, since Rory's birth was the best day of my life, but I only did it for Clair- it was HER choice. My heart was in my throat for every step of it and I don't think she realised till afterwards how much pressure she'd put me under. I was fricking terrified.
That said... there were a few things that the documentary didn't touch on- such as the fact that she was a neonatal nurse, we'd both done a long st johns birth/first aid course, and our local hospital was a 4 min drive away- I think those things do make a difference. And the fact that it was her third baby helped too, as she trusted her body more than a first time mum would iykwim? In our case it was definitely an informed decision and the right one for us.
As for the definition of freebirth- it really doesn't matter so much- but for the record our midwife had wanted to be there with us as a friend, NOT to assist, but she was threatened with her job if she was there for the birth- assisting or not. So obviously she couldn't be there. The legalties and red tape is crazy.
before midwives where around millions and millions of people gave birth themselves all over the world, people still do it in tribes etc.
I agree that it's not a true "freebirth" if medical assistance is present in any way. It's more like a pseudo free birth.
a freebirth is an unnassisted birth. therefore if a midwife is present but not assisting it is still a freebirth. if at some point there is complications and a midwife has to intervene it then is not considered freebirth anymore
before midwives where around millions and millions of people gave birth themselves all over the world, people still do it in tribes etc.
Not true, there have been midwives around, in one form or another, for a very long time. People used to go and fetch the midwife or an experienced female relative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwives
Freebirth is not something I ever considered as I feel it would be taking silly risks with both my and my child's life. Something that really stuck with me after my first birth (em-CS) was someone that my mum knew from Africa said that if I had been in Africa I would have been left until I died at which point they would have tried to get the baby out.
I think having an unnassisted birth is a slap in the face to all the women and babys who have died but could have been saved with simple medical help. Retained placenta leading to hemorage or infection. Babys being stillborn when they could have been saved with an emergancy section.
Some women would kill for the medical help we have.