Women decide gender not men?

nickyb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
793
Reaction score
0
If u can read to the end of this long article wot do u all think possible or not?

For centuries before the advent of modern medical science, it was believed that the woman was responsible for the birth of a male or a female child and that the male had no say in choosing the sex of the unborn baby. Even today in many Indian villages and other rural areas around the world (where ignorance of medical knowledge still prevails)--it is the woman who is still incriminated and blamed for repeatedly giving birth to a female child. But now with the discovery of the x-chromosomes sperms and y-chromosomes sperms in the semen, the medical scientists proclaimed that it is the male who is responsible for choosing or selecting the sex of the baby. But the medical scientists have overlooked one very important factor : namely the patho-physiological conditions, status of the sperms and the ovum and other unseen factors leading to chemotaxis (attraction of the sperms towards the ovum)---which finally leads to conception and eventua lly decides the sex of the baby.

Now let us examine the patho-physiology and the ionic status of the 'x' and 'y' sperms, and the variable charge of the ovum, which ultimately decides which sperm (x or y) will fertilize the ovum.

By prior knowledge we now know that sperms containing the X chromosome are negatively charged while sperms containing the Y chromosome are positively charged. This fact was observed when the sperms were separated by electrophoresis. Numerous studies have revealed that when a weak electrical current was passed through a solution containing spermatozoa, those with the X chromosome were attracted by the anode (+) and those with the Y chromosome by the cathode (-). Some scientists have also identified the appearance of a brief luminous ring at the moment of contact between spermatozoon and ovule. This phenomenon has since been measured and is proof of an electrical involvement in fertilization. Also the charge on the ovum membrane was not fixed but alternated from positive to neutral and to a negative charge in a cycle. This was called the polarity cycle of the ovum membrane. This polarity was found to be predictable but totally separate from the menstrual cycle. The polarity cycle, which is unknown to most of us, was there in addition to the ovulation/menstrual cycle.

The argument behind this finding is that gender (sex) of the baby is influenced by what scientists call "ionic factors" which generate the charge on the ovum membrane and on the sperms.

First let us view this in a different way---According to the Laws of nature----whatever is happening at the microscopic level is reflected in the happenings at the macroscopic level or in other words whatever happens at the physical (gross) level is a reflection of what happens at the subtle (cellular) level. So we now come to the most important aspect of man-woman relationship i.e. marriage (selection of the partner for mating).

Let us now consider the marriage ceremony in various religions:

In Christianity---it is the bride who is first asked by the priest "whether she accepts the would-be bridegroom as the lawfully-wedded husband".

In Hinduism---it is the bride who first garlands the bridegroom, meaning that she has accepted him as her husband and she will bear his children only.

Also it would be worthwhile to note that in Muslim marriage---the would-be bride only is asked by the muslim priest whether she accepts the invitation of marriage (nikah) from her would-be husband following which the marriage is solemnized.

So in man-woman relationship, man is always the proposer and woman is always the chooser never vice versa.

From the above observation we can say that the proposing rights are a male prerogative and the choosing rights lie exclusively with the female. Just as a woman cannot be impregnated against her wishes, similarly at the microlevel both sperms (x and y having different charge) are attracted to the ovum having a variable charge---but only the sperm, which has the opposite charge from that of the ovum will be able to fertilize the ovum and the other sperm will be rejected.

So when the ovum membrane is positively charged, it will attract the sperm carrying X chromosome (which is negatively charged) and a baby girl is produced. When the ovum membrane is negatively charged, it will attract the sperm carrying the Y chromosome (which is positively charged), and a baby boy is produced. In short, we can say that the 'mating rights' are exclusively with the ovum only; once the ovum is fertilized then only the x or y sperm determines the sex of the baby (xx means a female and xy means a male). So would it not be most appropriate to say that it is the female that chooses the sex of the baby (by virtue of selecting which sperm to mate with) and the male only determines the sex of the baby after conception.

Conclusion:Female of the species is more powerful than the male.
 
I don't know really what to say about this, but interesting article. Thanks! :)
 
Considering it goes into religious vows and ends with the pithy 'women are more powerful' kind of statement, I'd say it's one of those crap things passed around on facebook to get 'likes' and data mine you. Where did you find it?
 
Considering it goes into religious vows and ends with the pithy 'women are more powerful' kind of statement, I'd say it's one of those crap things passed around on facebook to get 'likes' and data mine you. Where did you find it?

It was a link on one of the Chinese gender sites lol
 
I can't find this information on any reputable site. It seems like a new age theory that some people are using to sell gender prediction charts (that's mostly what came up in my search). I don't think it's true, but I'm probably the most skeptical person you'll ever meet. Lol

Also, using religion and female empowerment to support the claim makes it seem less reputable to me.

This site is even using this theory to sell gender prediction charts based on this theory for $599!!!!!!!!! https://www.choicebaby.com/how-to-choose-gender/

This one is Rp. 3,900,000 (which seems impossibly high). https://www.anakpilihan.com/en/faq.html

These are some of the first results that came up in my research. I know I'm a wet blanket (please forgive me), but it sounds like a scam to me.
 
Ok, when I read what everyone said then I think this is a scam to make things look lovely to sell a product. Disregard! Lol
 
Yeah it does sound a bit new age lol still it's all fun :)
 
Uhm…

Just as a woman cannot be impregnated against her wishes

Is it just me that finds that grossly offensive? Pregnancy after rape is a very real thing that affects hundreds of thousands of women worldwide every year.

Just based on that shocking statement, I'm going to say the whole article is hokum.
 
I liked reading that found it interesting thanks hun

Emma
 
If you google ovum polarity there's lots about it :)

Emma
 
Uhm…

Just as a woman cannot be impregnated against her wishes

Is it just me that finds that grossly offensive? Pregnancy after rape is a very real thing that affects hundreds of thousands of women worldwide every year.

Just based on that shocking statement, I'm going to say the whole article is hokum.

My thoughts exactly. Its positively 100% FAKE/non-factual/lacking evidence.
 
I think the op thought it was a bit of fun and interesting that's the way I took it I googled it quite a lot about it some people are really into it lol

Emma
 
Seemed plausible until i read the bit about women not being able to be impregnated against there will, instant loss of crediblity!
 
honestly, i really find it superficial on many levels - scientific (in terms of molecular biology as well as standard biology), sociological, religious...

...there is no such things like black and white in nature, there are always multiple factors playing a game in every process down here, sex determination included. the ionic factor is JUST a factor. and technically, man still does determine the sex, as only men carry both X and Y chromosomes, introducing that option anyway.

and generally, imho, the whole "female" over "male" "power" is a poor idea, whatever sex dominates... it shouldn't be about power or domination, it should be about harmony, collaboration, balance, you know, those things healthy relationships should be built upon and contain...
 
Considering it goes into religious vows and ends with the pithy 'women are more powerful' kind of statement, I'd say it's one of those crap things passed around on facebook to get 'likes' and data mine you. Where did you find it?

It was a link on one of the Chinese gender sites lol

:haha: I was about to mention that it would sort of support the chinese gender charts! I do believe in such things, i believe ancient knowledge to be closer to the truth generally anyway. It makes perfect sense to me. The chinese gender charts was right for me, who else?
 
FYI there is no such thing as a Muslim priest...
 
Yeah a woman can't get pregnant against her wishes and only witches float haha! There are just too many hilarious nuggets in this to not pick it a part a bit sorry OP. In 2/3 of the world women are in arranged marriages and have no say in who, why, or what tender age they are married off so when I read this I can't help but see an agenda of manipulation on the other end to somehow veil the injustices against women by making us feel "empowered" lol. This exact way of thinking and basis for reproduction has been resurfaced and leaned on when dealing with women's rights here in the states (I won't mention the topics as they aren't allowed on the forum respectively). Google Todd Akins Senate...

I know you were just having a bit of fun but the logic behind this article is a bigger part of a more dangerous way of thinking imo and if you see what path it can lead to you might do a double take!
 
Firstly no need to apologise , I didn't post this article because it's my opinion it was a bit of fun a diff novel way at looking at gender swaying much the same as timing methods, diet sways, etc etc they are to be taken with a pinch of salt!!

As u may have read above the article I was asking for people's opinion about the idea ie the negative/ positive impact of the egg but I think some people preferred to disect the article picking up on religious quotes etc and missed the point

But for those who just saw it for what it was :thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,281
Messages
27,143,527
Members
255,745
Latest member
mnmorrison79
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->