We had alot of sex education.
I think the sex education this is a cop out tbh as its equally (if not more so) up to the parents to teach their children about safe sex. Parents need to take responsibilty for their children rather then shifting it onto the schools
We had alot of sex education.
I think the sex education this is a cop out tbh as its equally (if not more so) up to the parents to teach their children about safe sex. Parents need to take responsibilty for their children rather then shifting it onto the schools
I totally agree with you.
To say that there isn't enough sex ed is totally a cop out. The vast majority kids of that age know about sex, they know they shouldn't be doing it and to blame it on not having an abundance of sex ed classes in schools is rubbish. Why can't it come down to the parents teaching their children to have a bit of patience and some morals???
We had alot of sex education.
I think the sex education this is a cop out tbh as its equally (if not more so) up to the parents to teach their children about safe sex. Parents need to take responsibilty for their children rather then shifting it onto the schools
I totally agree with you.
To say that there isn't enough sex ed is totally a cop out. The vast majority kids of that age know about sex, they know they shouldn't be doing it and to blame it on not having an abundance of sex ed classes in schools is rubbish. Why can't it come down to the parents teaching their children to have a bit of patience and some morals???
Kids having sex at a young age though doesn't mean their parents didn't teach them any morals or right from wrong or patience or anything else.
Teenagers act out and rebel, it's in their nature.
Id say 95% of teenagers have rebeled in some way regardless of what kind of morals they were taught -- whether it be sex, partying, drinking, smoking, drugs. Or maybe all of the above.
Parents can talk to their kids, but most teenagers will still end up doing something that is in some way wrong and they will know it is wrong when they are doing it.
We had alot of sex education.
I think the sex education this is a cop out tbh as its equally (if not more so) up to the parents to teach their children about safe sex. Parents need to take responsibilty for their children rather then shifting it onto the schools
I totally agree with you.
To say that there isn't enough sex ed is totally a cop out. The vast majority kids of that age know about sex, they know they shouldn't be doing it and to blame it on not having an abundance of sex ed classes in schools is rubbish. Why can't it come down to the parents teaching their children to have a bit of patience and some morals???
Kids having sex at a young age though doesn't mean their parents didn't teach them any morals or right from wrong or patience or anything else.
Teenagers act out and rebel, it's in their nature.
Id say 95% of teenagers have rebeled in some way regardless of what kind of morals they were taught -- whether it be sex, partying, drinking, smoking, drugs. Or maybe all of the above.
Parents can talk to their kids, but most teenagers will still end up doing something that is in some way wrong and they will know it is wrong when they are doing it.
Maybe my wording was a bit off but come on, kids having sex at 12 and 13?? It's ridiculous. If I found out my son was having sex at that age I'd put a stop to it PRONTO!
You parent your child, that's how. His backside would be in the house. End of. As fpor having sex at school, I don't know what kind of school you went to but I've nevetr heard of it here!! lol
It irritates me when people assume that those who have sex young have been on the end of bad parenting. My Dad obviously didn't take a role with those discussions because well he's a bloke and what teenage girl wants to hear that from her Dad? (He is a fantastic Dad though) He left it up to my Gran to have 'girlie chats' and 'shoves' in the 'right direction'. I had it drummed into me that I should wait until I was married to lose my virginity..........I didn't and lost it when I was 14. Not a result of bad parenting at all. I do wish people would stop blaming the parents, I think at that age, we can all take responsibility for our own actions.
Same goes for blaming schools. At that age, people know sex can result in sti's and pregnancy but that doesn't make them be responsible because often people take the "it won't happen to me" viewpoint which yes is daft but they are still informed of the facts and make a choice to go against them anyway.
I myself have been guilty of having unprotected sex on occasion. But that doesn't mean I didn't know the facts, I knew the risks, I knew it was illegal, I knew that I should use protection but on rare occasions I didn't bother. I think many teenagers are like that. Its not down to the parents or the school or anything other than the individual themselves. I and everyone else in my opinion is responsible for their own actions.
I've only read the first few pages but i can't entirely agree with the "if she has the right support". That kind of support is astronomical compared to what 20 year olds + need. For one, (in Canada anyways), you can't legally work until you are 14, you can't drive until you are 16 and only in the daytime. So, how is she supposed to financially support her child and get the child to the hospital if need be. Yes, I know you can get around without driving, but the fact that legally a 13 year old cannot drive is a valid point. Because when she does turn 16 she's a new driver, and with such precious cargo!
All that being said, I suppose, yes, a 13 year old "could" be a good mom, if we look at what a good mom means. That's why I brought up the age of working ability. A good mom should be able to financially support her family. Emotionally, the brains of children are not fully developed until their early 20's. The last thing to develop is the ability to understand consequences. That's why so many teenagers do so many stupid things, drinking and driving, sneaking out, stealing moms car, etc. They are not wired to really extrapolate and think of the consequences of their choices. Put a newborn into the mix and that situation would need massive support!
wait whut?! if you cant drive your a bad mum now?!
im a teenager, ive never snuck out, stole a car, drunk and drive, i dont do 'stupid' things. we rent our house privately and have no financial help other than what every other mother is entitled to. we have no debts and have alot of nice things we saved for and my LO goes without nothing, were two 19 year olds with a baby in a house on our own, but to you thats a reciepe for disaster right? lol
a lot of mums on here wouldnt be able to provide for their family without their OHs that doesnt make them bad at all.
i cant stand it when people think moneys everything.
I know some teen moms (not as yoing as 13 but 15 or 16 year olds) that end up being better mothers than some of the 30 year olds I know!
It really depends on the person & the support that they have.
It may not be acceptable in our society but there was a time when it was normal to have children at that age.