Abigailly
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2009
- Messages
- 1,696
- Reaction score
- 1
I will be voting yes. I think we should (and are more than capable of!) governing ourselves. Remember a vote for independence is NOT a vote for the snp. There would be an election shortly afterwards where we could vote for whoever else. At the moment we are governed by a party with 1?!! seat in Scotland. It just doesn't make sense democratically. We are different nations, with different political ideologies.
Scotland has plenty of industry to stay afloat. Although I think an additional £1600 (?!)/ head is spent in Scotland, tax revenues we give back are about £500/ head more than that.
We have a chance at creating a fairer more equal society, we should grab it with both hands. In Britain at the moment the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Food banks in an oil rich, wealthy nation?! Surely we can do better than that.
Salmond is striving towards a country similar to Norway I believe. The happiest place to live in the world apparently (regardless of the price of a pint!), I say why not? Rather that than more of the same.
I saw Nicola Sturgeon on the daily politics. I thought she did well. Yeah she dodged the question of a plan b for a currency as we are apparently not going to be "allowed" to use the pound (which of course we can, any country can, similar to how Cuba uses USD). She was no worse than David Cameron who dodges questions every week at pmq's. Anyway although all the westminster parties have all said we won't have a currency union if we go independent, it would be in both countries interest if we did due to the division of debt and other factors . This is scaremongering from Westminster.
Personally I think we should ditch the pound altogether if it means giving any sort of power back. I think there definitely is a "plan b" but snp are keeping quiet for now.
I would LOVE to see a leaders debate Salmond v Cameron. It's not goin to happen though. DC is too smart for that, he knows Salmond would wipe the floor with him.
It actually does sadden me, the thought of us breaking up as a country. But I just think the union has had it's day and it's time to go it alone.
It's nice to see an opposing argument that isn't just a vote for SNP. It's balanced.
I don't think Cameron and Salmond should fight it out though. Not because Salmond would wipe the floor with him (which he would, because Salmond doesn't have to put forward any facts. His entire arguments are 'what ifs', automatically making a point stronger),, but because it will turn it into political debate of Tories v SNP. And that's the last thing we need. People voting because of who is a current political party leader. The whole thing is bigger than that. It's bigger than even who the political parties are, let alone who is in them.
You say that you think Salmond has a back up plan but is keeping it quiet? How can he keep it quiet? We're months away from the polls and he's still not given us a definitive answer. We can't get the Euro for anything other than a short term option if we don't create a union with the UK immediately, as we don't fit with the 5 categories of the Convergence Criteria. And they won't budge on that one. Hungary etc are living proof of that.
And with the pound we can use it, however we will have no control over it. Our currency will be controlled by the BoE. Which surely isn't independence? It also means that if we ever need a bail out we won't legally be entitled. We will have no back up.
So far the RUK have said they won't enter a currency union until Scotland is secure. And Sturgeon's go to phrase during that 'they'll change their mind after a yes vote', and Salmond's 'They're bluffing'. Really aren't filling me with confidence. RUK don't need to bluff. They hold all the cards.