babyblog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2009
- Messages
- 3,230
- Reaction score
- 0
I seem to be one of the few women who thinks this would be a good thing. A c section delivery costs £800 pounds more than a vaginal one, so yes it costs more money but it gives women more choice over their bodies and their babies.
From my own experience, i found my opinion counted for nothing when i was in labour, my baby was in distress and i was refused a c section. 6 hours later when his heart beat dropped so low it almost stopped they said i could have one so i was rushed through in a panic. I feel my feelings were completely ignored and my baby could have died just because somebody decided i couldn't have a section. So i welcome the right to choose.IN my opinion it is my body, my baby so my choice.
I don't actually think a lot more women would opt for a section. And money could be saved as other problems could be prevented which develop after a traumatic delivery. Also, it may actually help with the MW staffing shortage as women could have a scheduled appt and therefore they will know when they room in theatre to deliver the babies.
I welcome the change.
From my own experience, i found my opinion counted for nothing when i was in labour, my baby was in distress and i was refused a c section. 6 hours later when his heart beat dropped so low it almost stopped they said i could have one so i was rushed through in a panic. I feel my feelings were completely ignored and my baby could have died just because somebody decided i couldn't have a section. So i welcome the right to choose.IN my opinion it is my body, my baby so my choice.
I don't actually think a lot more women would opt for a section. And money could be saved as other problems could be prevented which develop after a traumatic delivery. Also, it may actually help with the MW staffing shortage as women could have a scheduled appt and therefore they will know when they room in theatre to deliver the babies.
I welcome the change.