Cervical length, is this ok?

[KMCN]

I am currently 20 weeks pregnant with a precious baby girl. I go in for cervical measurements every two weeks due to a loss of twins at 23 weeks 2 years ago. So far my cervix has been measuring fine. Today, it measured about 3.5 without pressure, and 3.2 with pressure. The tech said this is normal. I asked if the cervix normally changes a little with pressure, and he said of course. He said it doesn't usually stay completely the same with pressure because there IS pressure. It's bound to change a little bit. He told me the big thing is to watch if there is any funneling, or if it significantly changes under pressure. He said my cervix shortens a tiny bit, but that it is normal. Is this true? Just want to makes sure since I'm paranoid due to a previous loss. The cervix is bound to change a tiny bit with pressure, correct? It shouldn't be exactly the same? Thank you!

 

[luckycharm1]

Hi
I was diagnosed with incompetent cervix after giving birth to my first at 26 weeks. With my secondI wwent for a growth scan at 27 weeks and my cervix was 12 mm short and funneling was 23mm long. I put myself on moderate bed rest and had my baby at 38 weeks! Fingers crossed for u

ur cervix length seems fine. Its not opening nor funneling which is good.

 

[25weeker]

My cervix was 3.2 at 18 weeks which they were happy with. My cervix was being monitored because in my first pregnancy I dilated at 21 weeks with twins. An emergency stitch was placed after 5 days which got me to 25 weeks. If it helps reassure you I delivered my son at 40+1 so it appears its just a twin pregnancy that my cervix couldn't cope with.

Good luck x