LaRockera
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 4,492
- Reaction score
- 0
Thanks.
And as far as your idea of not being a 'fertility queen'... you seem fertile enough to me. I think all those women that brag about how 'fertile' they are by conceiving the first cycle are just dumper than a brick wall. It's really just a matter of luck, and most of the time in juxtaposition with age.
It was kind of reassuring to read that the average time a couple in their 30s take is nine months. It doesn't make the BFNs any easier to deal with, but at least it helps me keep things into perspective.
![]()
True, that does help keep it in perspective.
But with the first, I was only 25 and had a lot of difficulty with getting pregnant. Personally, everyone that I know that has kids, is above average in the fertility department. Noone has taken longer than 4 months to conceive, even in their 30s. It's hard to remember those statistics when getting repeated bfns.
See, that's the thing.
I used to focus on those couples that succeeded within six months and draw comparisons.
Only after I opened my eyes did I realise that I know a lot of people that took them between one to two years.
And then there are a lot of people that believe it or not will lie about it. Don't ask me why. We can only presume. It's true.
I know of couples that blissfully succeeded on their first try, and others that went on trying for more than a year. So I'd like to think that this is truly a matter of luck (although I do think it's a good idea to check yourself out after a while if you're worried).
