I find it interesting that for a few people her parenting has come into question, at least indirectly choosing to say "I prefer to spend the time with my kids" or whatever, who says that is the aspect that needs to be de-prioritised? I didn't read the article, but maybe she gets up before her kids do to exercise? Exercise is important and it isn't something we prioritise any more and I am totally talking about myself, my husband exercises most days, no detriment to his job, our relationship or his relationship with our son and he looks amazing, he is rarely moody and I know he's a better dad for it. I don't prioritise exercise, I admit I have a busy life with working 4 days, having a toddler and studying a masters, but I also know I somehow manage to fit in X factor and many more tv programmes so I know in my life there is room for exercise that wouldn't deprive my son time with me, I MUST do it and really will try after the baby (I should say I am slim, but that doesn't make me fit!)
I also find it interesting how everybody assumes she most dedicate her life to it, someone said it takes 9 months to lose baby weight? Not true, I was in size (UK) 10 jeans the day after giving birth, my stomach snapped back down in days, I don't weigh myself but I know I was slimmer in the week after giving birth than I was the week before getting pregnant, I credit it to BF tbh I didn't do anything else I'm not necessarily expecting it to happen again this time lol but we all carry, put on and lose weight differently, some people it takes a lot of effort others it doesn't take any effort at all, there's no need to assume because someone is fit they are depriving their children, and if she chooses to work on her body, good for her, it's more productive than most of the things I do in my spare time when DS is sleeping!
But yeah the title is a bit arrogant, but it's a magazine article, would we be talking about it otherwise?