Hi Lizzie, can I pick your brains? You always give amazing advice.
I am basically pooing my self about the previous stenosis I had on my cervix after my LLETZ 3 years ago.
My cervix was blocked from the external os and my periods couldn't come at all. I had ultrasound scans that showed a build up of fluid in my uterus so I was booked for a cervical dilation under GA.
A week before my scheduled op I had contraction like pains for a day or so (definitely wasn't pregnant) Then one night woke up in a pool of blood. I had basically exploded. The doc compared it to a champagne bottle cork! The pressure just built up and I exploded. lol
My periods then returned into a regular pattern but were extremely painful the day before and the 1st day of. Colposcopy showed that my external os was still very small, that they couldn't get an adequate sample for my smear test. So the doc recommended that she try to dilate me slightly there and then with rods. She managed a little but said it prob wouldn't last.
After this I got pregnant and really wasn't expecting to have the weak cervix that my transvaginal scan showed. If anything I was expecting to have problems with dilation.
My understanding is that the stenosis or narrowing was at the bottom of my cervix but the transvaginal scans showed shortening and funnelling from the internal os. I am scared of not dilating properly during labour. Do u think this will be a problem for me? Or do u thing that if my body was able to contract my cervix enough under the pressure of fluid build up in my uterus then it will be able to dilate me to 10 with contractions? Or does the fact I had shortening and funnelling mean that if anything the whole cervix will be weak? Sorry for rambling and thanks for reading