Kate McCann releasing a book...

They are 100% responsible for what happened to her whether she was abducted or not, if they hadn't left their kids unnatended the whole thing could have been avoided, it makes me cringe when people feel sorry for them tbh, Madeline is the one who's suffered the most in all of this. She'd still be here today of it wasn't for her parents neglect.

I honestly think she had an accident and died whilst they were at the restaurant and they covered it up, probably to save their careers and not lose the twins. The fact that there was no evidence at the apartment to suggest an abduction is very odd IMO, they usually find something even if it's just a footprint or something slightly out of place. Not to mention the dogs sniffing out blood and human cadaver smell, dogs don't have the capabilities to lie.

One day the truth will come out, i mean how can it not? I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one waiting for it to happen. Little Maddie deserves justice.
 
If it was just Madeliene that was left alone they maybe I would be a bit more on the fence about it but 3 children under 3??? come on now their supposed to be professionals ...

I definately think they arent telling the truth whether it was an accident or not something happend
 
Is it true Gerry McCann was making sexual gestures about children a few days before she disapeared :shock:
 
Took me a few days to read through all of this thread and the links attached. I've always thought they had more to do with this than meets the eye. Totally agree that Gerry seems very controlling.

From the things I've read it's left me puzzling a few things - like when reading the link about the apartment not being sold it says you have to declare all owners - well surey as the McCanns didn't own it then why declare them? Someone called McCann owns it but 'allegedly' she has nothing to do with them.

Also I really think this was foreplanned in some way. I think for whatever reason they wanted rid of Madeleine, maybe they couldn't control her and wanted to just have the twins and knew anything they did in the UK would be investigated much more thoroughly...might be wrong but it's one of the possibilities in my mind.

I read Kate's book thinking maybe she might be able to convince me they were innocent but didn't, quite the opposite in fact. All I got from her book is that they are both selfish narcissistic people.

I just can't understand why anyone would go on holidays with their 3 kids and then spend hardly any of the time with them - the poor kids were in creches all day, quick high tea and maybe an hour or so with parents then put to bed and left alone - why not leave them at home with their grandparents?

They said they didn't eat out with the kids as the restaurnt was pretty far and they had no buggy with them - surely any parent with any common sense with 3 small kids would have buggy as top of their list to bring?? I'd bring a buggy just for JJ and have him eat out with me in the evening then put him to bed and I and whoever I was with could have a few drinks on the balcony close by - why couldn't they have done that (if of course their version of events is true!) Also read that after Madeleine's 'disappearance' Mark Warner loaned them a double buggy for the twins - so if it was available why not get it from the start? Or buy one in the town? It all stinks.

The viewings of the man carrying a child - how come the police dismissed other viewings saying it was 'too dark' but accepted Jane Liar Tanner's viewing even though it would have been as dark then?? Because the other one's too closely resembled Gerry perhaps?

The thing about Kate's clothes having the 'scent of death' because she dealt with 6 corpses in work? That is just ludicrous!! Firstly she'd have to have dealt with them all the same day to have the scent on that one outfit - unless she wears one outfit for the week which I highly doubt. Also who brings their work clothes on holidays - most people buy new 'holiday clothes' going and I'm sure someone of Kate and Gerry's means could have afforded whole new holiday wardrobes.

Who is the senior politician who was on holidays with them and left abruptly when Maddy disappeared? I think this holds the key to a lot of the coverup - he/she would have helped them get everything covered up so quickly, probably to keep their own name out of the scandal. Gordon Brown getting involved, Clarence Mitchell etc - it's friends in high places that gets you that.

I think it is just unbelievable that the police can't see any of this, it's so obvious to all of us so must be even more so to them. What hold does Gerry have over this person or over whoever that he can get all of this just swept under the carpet?
 
It's all very dark and chilling to say the least. That poor little girl:(
 
That poor little Angel, I feel so much for her. I do feel bad for her parents, IF she was abducted as obviously we know nothing. They did the complete wrong thing, and I'm surprised legal action hasn't been taken. Who leaves their kids alone? But - If she was abducted, they are going through the worst thing you could, and they SHOULD feel guilty, but at the same time they're going to be feeling enough pain for the rest of their lives for it. I hope they've learned something, and don't leave their little ones alone ever.

Prayers for Madeline. x
 
Took me a few days to read through all of this thread and the links attached. I've always thought they had more to do with this than meets the eye. Totally agree that Gerry seems very controlling.

From the things I've read it's left me puzzling a few things - like when reading the link about the apartment not being sold it says you have to declare all owners - well surey as the McCanns didn't own it then why declare them? Someone called McCann owns it but 'allegedly' she has nothing to do with them.

Also I really think this was foreplanned in some way. I think for whatever reason they wanted rid of Madeleine, maybe they couldn't control her and wanted to just have the twins and knew anything they did in the UK would be investigated much more thoroughly...might be wrong but it's one of the possibilities in my mind.

I read Kate's book thinking maybe she might be able to convince me they were innocent but didn't, quite the opposite in fact. All I got from her book is that they are both selfish narcissistic people.

I just can't understand why anyone would go on holidays with their 3 kids and then spend hardly any of the time with them - the poor kids were in creches all day, quick high tea and maybe an hour or so with parents then put to bed and left alone - why not leave them at home with their grandparents?

They said they didn't eat out with the kids as the restaurnt was pretty far and they had no buggy with them - surely any parent with any common sense with 3 small kids would have buggy as top of their list to bring?? I'd bring a buggy just for JJ and have him eat out with me in the evening then put him to bed and I and whoever I was with could have a few drinks on the balcony close by - why couldn't they have done that (if of course their version of events is true!) Also read that after Madeleine's 'disappearance' Mark Warner loaned them a double buggy for the twins - so if it was available why not get it from the start? Or buy one in the town? It all stinks.

The viewings of the man carrying a child - how come the police dismissed other viewings saying it was 'too dark' but accepted Jane Liar Tanner's viewing even though it would have been as dark then?? Because the other one's too closely resembled Gerry perhaps?

The thing about Kate's clothes having the 'scent of death' because she dealt with 6 corpses in work? That is just ludicrous!! Firstly she'd have to have dealt with them all the same day to have the scent on that one outfit - unless she wears one outfit for the week which I highly doubt. Also who brings their work clothes on holidays - most people buy new 'holiday clothes' going and I'm sure someone of Kate and Gerry's means could have afforded whole new holiday wardrobes.

Who is the senior politician who was on holidays with them and left abruptly when Maddy disappeared? I think this holds the key to a lot of the coverup - he/she would have helped them get everything covered up so quickly, probably to keep their own name out of the scandal. Gordon Brown getting involved, Clarence Mitchell etc - it's friends in high places that gets you that.

I think it is just unbelievable that the police can't see any of this, it's so obvious to all of us so must be even more so to them. What hold does Gerry have over this person or over whoever that he can get all of this just swept under the carpet?

I am going to go through the points one by one. They would have to declare who it was owned by and then comes the point it was where Maddie was 'taken', people in that area know, so it would just be a case of two and two together.

I think in some circles, taking children on holiday and not spending much time with them is normal. Alien to us though.

I dont think the police are involved in a coverup at all. So if they say it was too dark then I would be inclined to believe them. Maybe because she was near a building and therefore there was light whereas the others seem to be across the road and also down dark roads. Although I dont think they believe her now, they just did when she first said it.

Agreed about her clothes, who as a GP deals with that many bodies so quickly and also who as a GP, with the risk of carrying goodness knows what on their clothes, wears work clothes on holiday :wacko:

I do believe the police see all of this, the problem is; where is the proof?
 
I heard they had a nanny at home? Why not take the nanny with them or get a temp if their permanent nanny didn't want to come with them? It has fish printed all over it.

And I, plus many others, want to know why they haven't been charged with neglect. I wouldn't care what had happened, leaving young children is neglect and I would make sure they paid the time for it, just like some lowly working class mother and father would.

They're disgusting. I was hoping the leveson enquiry was going to find some cracks in their story, but no such luck obviously.
 
Plus the resort has a babysitting service. GPs are on 150k plus a year- so Kate had at least 8k disposable income a month and I imagine Gerry was on similar. 16k swirling around the bank and they couldnt afford a babysitter? C'mon.....
 
Plus the resort has a babysitting service. GPs are on 150k plus a year- so Kate had at least 8k disposable income a month and I imagine Gerry was on similar. 16k swirling around the bank and they couldnt afford a babysitter? C'mon.....

The argument for that would be that a babysitting service is just someone who walks by every hour, and as they were going in every 15-30 minutes they were actually seeing them and more regularly than a 'babysitting' service, so it wouldnt of changed anything.

This isnt my opinion btw just saying.
 
Plus the resort has a babysitting service. GPs are on 150k plus a year- so Kate had at least 8k disposable income a month and I imagine Gerry was on similar. 16k swirling around the bank and they couldnt afford a babysitter? C'mon.....

The argument for that would be that a babysitting service is just someone who walks by every hour, and as they were going in every 15-30 minutes they were actually seeing them and more regularly than a 'babysitting' service, so it wouldnt of changed anything.

This isnt my opinion btw just saying.

Ahhh ok didn't realise that :thumbup:
 
I've been looking more into the illuminati stuff recently. Them being somehow affiliated with the illuminati is the only thing I can think as to how Gerry and Kate have had the power to influence the police/media that they are innocent. Otherwise what other way could there be that they are SO protected in all this?? I'm not saying I believe in all the illuminati stuff, I don't know what I believe with all that tbh, I haven't looked deep enough into it. But I just struggle otherwise to understand how they have carried on living their lives without having an negative press or interference from police/social services etc. Just bizarre.
 
I've been looking more into the illuminati stuff recently. Them being somehow affiliated with the illuminati is the only thing I can think as to how Gerry and Kate have had the power to influence the police/media that they are innocent. Otherwise what other way could there be that they are SO protected in all this?? I'm not saying I believe in all the illuminati stuff, I don't know what I believe with all that tbh, I haven't looked deep enough into it. But I just struggle otherwise to understand how they have carried on living their lives without having an negative press or interference from police/social services etc. Just bizarre.

I'm sure they had a connection with Rupert Murdoch xx
 
Ahhh ok didn't realise that :thumbup:

Me neither. I dont believe for one second they were checking up on them that regularly btw, if at all, but it is what they claim.

I've been looking more into the illuminati stuff recently. Them being somehow affiliated with the illuminati is the only thing I can think as to how Gerry and Kate have had the power to influence the police/media that they are innocent. Otherwise what other way could there be that they are SO protected in all this?? I'm not saying I believe in all the illuminati stuff, I don't know what I believe with all that tbh, I haven't looked deep enough into it. But I just struggle otherwise to understand how they have carried on living their lives without having an negative press or interference from police/social services etc. Just bizarre.

Have read about freemason's? They are suppose to be part of that.

I'm sure they had a connection with Rupert Murdoch xx

Yes they do.
 
I had a quick read about Freemasons, they don't seem as scary as the illuminati, haha. I dunno, its all just so dark and eerie, the depths this case has reached is just quite scary. Doing all these searches on my iPad, 'mccanns' 'Freemasons' 'illuminati', I'm just a teeny bit scared they are going to come looking for me...
 
Hahahaha. I remember being really worried that the more we speculated on here the more likely someone was to turn up at our house. So if I go, its been fun :rofl:

I think there is a darkside to the freemason's too. I cant remember what I have read, but freaked me out at the time. Oooooh maybe me forgetting is something they did :haha:
 
There behaviour has always been so different from other parents whos children have gone missing, they are so cold.

Part of me hopes she is found safe and alive but another part hopes that if she were abducted that it ended quickly for her :(
 
There behaviour has always been so different from other parents whos children have gone missing, they are so cold.

Part of me hopes she is found safe and alive but another part hopes that if she were abducted that it ended quickly for her :(

I agree- the pictures of them laughing and joking just says after she went missing are bizarre? :shrug:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,433
Messages
27,150,741
Members
255,849
Latest member
bmat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"