• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Nell McAndrew speaks out on extended breastfeeding

Obviously still breastfeeding isn't bad persay, of course breastmilk is healthy... But there is a point where bfing becomes more about the mother and not the child. IMO... once you get to 1-2 years it starts to become about the mother... not the child.

I know how stanch you are in your beliefs that BFing beyond a 6 months or so is not important, but you are so incorrect. There are so many benefits to BFing a child. Just google search it, and loads of information comes up.

https://www.kellymom.com/bf/bfextended/ebf-benefits.html

Nursing toddlers benefit NUTRITIONALLY
Although there has been little research done on children who breastfeed beyond the age of two, the available information indicates that breastfeeding continues to be a valuable source of nutrition and disease protection for as long as breastfeeding continues.
"Human milk expressed by mothers who have been lactating for >1 year has significantly increased fat and energy contents, compared with milk expressed by women who have been lactating for shorter periods. During prolonged lactation, the fat energy contribution of breast milk to the infant diet might be significant."
-- Mandel 2005
"Breast milk continues to provide substantial amounts of key nutrients well beyond the first year of life, especially protein, fat, and most vitamins."
-- Dewey 2001
In the second year (12-23 months), 448 mL of breastmilk provides:
29% of energy requirements
43% of protein requirements
36% of calcium requirements
75% of vitamin A requirements
76% of folate requirements
94% of vitamin B12 requirements
60% of vitamin C requirements
-- Dewey 2001
Studies done in rural Bangladesh have shown that breastmilk continues to be an important source of vitamin A in the second and third year of life.
-- Persson 1998
It's not uncommon for weaning to be recommended for toddlers who are eating few solids. However, this recommendation is not supported by research. According to Sally Kneidel in "Nursing Beyond One Year" (New Beginnings, Vol. 6 No. 4, July-August 1990, pp. 99-103.):
Some doctors may feel that nursing will interfere with a child's appetite for other foods. Yet there has been no documentation that nursing children are more likely than weaned children to refuse supplementary foods. In fact, most researchers in Third World countries, where a malnourished toddler's appetite may be of critical importance, recommend continued nursing for even the severely malnourished (Briend et al, 1988; Rhode, 1988; Shattock and Stephens, 1975; Whitehead, 1985). Most suggest helping the malnourished older nursing child not by weaning but by supplementing the mother's diet to improve the nutritional quality of her milk (Ahn and MacLean. 1980; Jelliffe and Jelliffe, 1978) and by offering the child more varied and more palatable foods to improve his or her appetite (Rohde, 1988; Tangermann, 1988; Underwood, 1985).

References

Nursing toddlers are SICK LESS OFTEN
The American Academy of Family Physicians notes that children weaned before two years of age are at increased risk of illness (AAFP 2001).
Nursing toddlers between the ages of 16 and 30 months have been found to have fewer illnesses and illnesses of shorter duration than their non-nursing peers (Gulick 1986).
"Antibodies are abundant in human milk throughout lactation" (Nutrition During Lactation 1991; p. 134). In fact, some of the immune factors in breastmilk increase in concentration during the second year and also during the weaning process. (Goldman 1983, Goldman & Goldblum 1983, Institute of Medicine 1991).
Per the World Health Organization, "a modest increase in breastfeeding rates could prevent up to 10% of all deaths of children under five: Breastfeeding plays an essential and sometimes underestimated role in the treatment and prevention of childhood illness." [emphasis added]
References

Nursing toddlers have FEWER ALLERGIES
Many studies have shown that one of the best ways to prevent allergies and asthma is to breastfeed exclusively for at least 6 months and continue breastfeeding long-term after that point.

Breastfeeding can be helpful for preventing allergy by:
reducing exposure to potential allergens (the later baby is exposed, the less likely that there will be an allergic reaction),
speeding maturation of the protective intestinal barrier in baby's gut,
coating the gut and providing a barrier to potentially allergenic molecules,
providing anti-inflammatory properties that reduce the risk of infections (which can act as allergy triggers).
References

Nursing toddlers are SMART
Extensive research on the relationship between cognitive achievement (IQ scores, grades in school) and breastfeeding has shown the greatest gains for those children breastfed the longest.
References

Nursing toddlers are WELL ADJUSTED SOCIALLY
According to Sally Kneidel in "Nursing Beyond One Year" (New Beginnings, Vol. 6 No. 4, July-August 1990, pp. 99-103.):

"Research reports on the psychological aspects of nursing are scarce. One study that dealt specifically with babies nursed longer than a year showed a significant link between the duration of nursing and mothers' and teachers' ratings of social adjustment in six- to eight-year-old children (Ferguson et al, 1987). In the words of the researchers, 'There are statistically significant tendencies for conduct disorder scores to decline with increasing duration of breastfeeding.'"
According to Elizabeth N. Baldwin, Esq. in "Extended Breastfeeding and the Law":
"Breastfeeding is a warm and loving way to meet the needs of toddlers and young children. It not only perks them up and energizes them; it also soothes the frustrations, bumps and bruises, and daily stresses of early childhood. In addition, nursing past infancy helps little ones make a gradual transition to childhood."
Baldwin continues: "Meeting a child's dependency needs is the key to helping that child achieve independence. And children outgrow these needs according to their own unique timetable." Children who achieve independence at their own pace are more secure in that independence then children forced into independence prematurely.
References

Nursing a toddler is NORMAL
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that "Breastfeeding should be continued for at least the first year of life and beyond for as long as mutually desired by mother and child... Increased duration of breastfeeding confers significant health and developmental benefits for the child and the mother... There is no upper limit to the duration of breastfeeding and no evidence of psychologic or developmental harm from breastfeeding into the third year of life or longer." (AAP 2005)
The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends that breastfeeding continue throughout the first year of life and that "Breastfeeding beyond the first year offers considerable benefits to both mother and child, and should continue as long as mutually desired." They also note that "If the child is younger than two years of age, the child is at increased risk of illness if weaned." (AAFP 2001)
A US Surgeon General has stated that it is a lucky baby who continues to nurse until age two. (Novello 1990)
The World Health Organization emphasizes the importance of nursing up to two years of age or beyond (WHO 1992, WHO 2002).
Scientific research by Katherine A. Dettwyler, PhD shows that 2.5 to 7.0 years of nursing is what our children have been designed to expect (Dettwyler 1995).
References [see also position statements supporting breastfeeding]

MOTHERS also benefit from nursing past infancy
Extended nursing delays the return of fertility in some women by suppressing ovulation (References).
Breastfeeding reduces the risk of breast cancer (References). Studies have found a significant inverse association between duration of lactation and breast cancer risk.
Breastfeeding reduces the risk of ovarian cancer (References).
Breastfeeding reduces the risk of uterine cancer (References).
Breastfeeding reduces the risk of endometrial cancer (References).
Breastfeeding protects against osteoporosis. During lactation a mother may experience decreases of bone mineral. A nursing mom's bone mineral density may be reduced in the whole body by 1 to 2 percent while she is still nursing. This is gained back, and bone mineral density may actually increase, when the baby is weaned from the breast. This is not dependent on additional calcium supplementation in the mother's diet. (References).
Breastfeeding reduces the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. (References).
Breastfeeding has been shown to decrease insulin requirements in diabetic women (References).
Breastfeeding moms tend to lose weight easier (References).




here is a huge list of articles. from the La Leche League about the benefits.

https://www.llli.org/NB/NBextended.html
 
Thank you for all the info Sam. Very interesting. x
 
I guess I wanted to play 'devils advocate' here in response to the post that quoted research 'evidence'. Just wanted to highlight that reearch is a tricky beast, as one lot of research will find one thing.... then another group of scientists dispute it the next year and prove a therory wrong. SO it's often better for us to remain grounded and take it all with a 'pinch of salt' but allow commen sense to guide us.

The research quoted above seems to be quite dated... I'd be more interested in recent findings I think. But, even then...... pinch of salt..... and be careful of wording such as 'significant findings'!!!
 
Well, I think a mother knows their child best, and if a mother wants to venture into extended breastfeeding, for her child, or herself, who elses business is it????

Don't really care if someone wants to BF their 7 year old. If they're happy and looked after, who are we to judge????
 
Great thread! In my humble opinion, it is the mother and the baby's option to breastfeed as long as they want to. For me personally, I don't plan on going longer than 12 months, and find it a little unnerving when a baby is old enough to ask for the boob. But it is natural, and certainly can't hurt!! :hugs:
 
I dont think anyone here is 'judgy' it seems everyone here has their own opinion, but no one I've come across of the forums seem the type to go out of there way to be nasty to anyone who chooses to extend the bf.....????!!!?

Perhaps the research qouted in Sam's post may make some ff mummies feel uncomfy though..... just a thought
 
I guess I wanted to play 'devils advocate' here in response to the post that quoted research 'evidence'. Just wanted to highlight that reearch is a tricky beast, as one lot of research will find one thing.... then another group of scientists dispute it the next year and prove a therory wrong. SO it's often better for us to remain grounded and take it all with a 'pinch of salt' but allow commen sense to guide us.

The research quoted above seems to be quite dated... I'd be more interested in recent findings I think. But, even then...... pinch of salt..... and be careful of wording such as 'significant findings'!!!

I completely agree... Where one research study may show that babies over a year shouldnt have much foods etc, in response to allergans, another study will show that exposing your child to allergans CAN help prevent allergies.

I dont agree with nursing babies or toddlers being sick any less then a ff baby or a shorter fed bf baby. I work in a hospital, I see kids day in and day out.

Lets put it this way, a researcher with a passion about breastfeeding will ALWAYS try and promote the outcomes to be towards bfing.

I was formula fed, weaned early and I was a perfectly healthy child with no allergies :D

My ohs sister bf both her children and they are sick constantly. The youngest was plaqued by weight issues and was until she was on a complete solid diet. She was severely underweight. And i've seen alot of BF babies/toddlers who are underweight because mothers arn't creating a balanced enough diet.

Everyone is more then welcome to do what they wish. But... As I said, after awhile nursing becomes more about the mother then the child.
 
I guess I wanted to play 'devils advocate' here in response to the post that quoted research 'evidence'. Just wanted to highlight that reearch is a tricky beast, as one lot of research will find one thing.... then another group of scientists dispute it the next year and prove a therory wrong. SO it's often better for us to remain grounded and take it all with a 'pinch of salt' but allow commen sense to guide us.

The research quoted above seems to be quite dated... I'd be more interested in recent findings I think. But, even then...... pinch of salt..... and be careful of wording such as 'significant findings'!!!

I completely agree... Where one research study may show that babies over a year shouldnt have much foods etc, in response to allergans, another study will show that exposing your child to allergans CAN help prevent allergies.

I dont agree with nursing babies or toddlers being sick any less then a ff baby or a shorter fed bf baby. I work in a hospital, I see kids day in and day out.

Lets put it this way, a researcher with a passion about breastfeeding will ALWAYS try and promote the outcomes to be towards bfing.

I was formula fed, weaned early and I was a perfectly healthy child with no allergies :D

My ohs sister bf both her children and they are sick constantly. The youngest was plaqued by weight issues and was until she was on a complete solid diet. She was severely underweight. And i've seen alot of BF babies/toddlers who are underweight because mothers arn't creating a balanced enough diet.

Everyone is more then welcome to do what they wish. But... As I said, after awhile nursing becomes more about the mother then the child.

Just curious, how do you know?
 
https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/features/article388487.ece

not saying i agree or disagree with all his statements, just wanted to show the kinda stuff about this out there
 
Yeah, there's plenty of stuff out there. So surely it should be up to each mum to decide which side they believe and which they don't? If they believe extended BF benefits them and/or their baby, then I don't see a problem.

Not going to lie, I thought BF was gross before I did it, but now I think it's the most wonderful thing for me and my daughter! She does need it. Sometimes I wish she didn't and I could just stop. I can't, because it's comfort to her, not just food.
 
i think you can find lots of research on the internet to back up both sides of this debate if you look for it. We are all doing what we think is best for our LO and it's great that all opinions are respected on here! I wish it was more like that in 'outside world' where a lot of people are very judgemental about how children are fed.
 
Yep, it's true, whether you bf or ff either way you're going to have people judging you for one reason or another but those are their reasons and we should all stick to our reasons.
As I've admitted, I would find seeing a 3+ year old breastfed slightly odd but I would never say anything to that mother, it's her choice.
Hope no one's taken anything I've written her personally, it's not meant to be an attack on you or the way you're raising your baby.
 
Totally agree angie and faerie!

I also would never comment or look down on someone who did extended bfing... even if it isnt something I totallt think is necessary.
 
To be honest it makes me a bit cross that people see breastfeeding after one year as extended breastfeeding. In fact, breastfeeding until the age of two is actually recommended by the World Health Organisation. Toddlers still need milk every day, so why shouldn't my son get nutritionally superior breast milk as well as cow's milk? Breastfeeding until two should be seen as completely normal!

I personally wouldn't breastfeed much beyond three years and I have the feeling Aaron will self-wean long before then, but there's nothing wrong with doing so.
 
Thanks for this. It was the confidence booster I needed. Lily turned 1 last month and we're still going strong. I think I'll be happy to breastfeed for a good while yet.
 
Breast feeding if you feel comfrotable doing it (I didn't so i formula feed my son) is perfectly natural and I don't think it is an issue up to 2 years if a baby is still breast fed. You see the cow and gate adverts on the TV about follow on milk for babies 1 year plus, they wouldn't make follow on Formulas if breast feeding wasn't still needed at that age in my opinion.

However, like anything which is used as a pacifier, breast, dummy etc there needs to be a cut of point where a child learns to self soothe or is soothed in a different way through cuddles etc. So I must say i find breast feeding in my opinion after about the 2 years mark a bit strange! like someone else said, when they are old enough to ask for it is when it makes me feel uncomfortable.
 
I'm so glad she did this it was a real confidence boost for me as i have (and still am) experiencng a lot of problems with BF due to a bad latch and very sore boobs, endless probelms with thrush, mastitus etc and i was feeling very defeated and wondering how long i should perservere but reading something like that article made me realise just how good it is for Alfie to carry on, i would LOVE to be able to BF for that long i really really would, i would be so grateful for just 1 day of painless feeding!!! And i would def BF til he's 2 if possible and that is definately not for my benefit as each feed is very painful for me, i would do it for Alfie's benefit just for the fact that it could reduce the risk of him having allergies (as i have LOADS) and of him getting crohns disease which i also have. I can't even imagine how amazing it must be to BF your child without it being painful, if only :cry:
 
I'm so glad she did this it was a real confidence boost for me as i have (and still am) experiencng a lot of problems with BF due to a bad latch and very sore boobs, endless probelms with thrush, mastitus etc and i was feeling very defeated and wondering how long i should perservere but reading something like that article made me realise just how good it is for Alfie to carry on, i would LOVE to be able to BF for that long i really really would, i would be so grateful for just 1 day of painless feeding!!! And i would def BF til he's 2 if possible and that is definately not for my benefit as each feed is very painful for me, i would do it for Alfie's benefit just for the fact that it could reduce the risk of him having allergies (as i have LOADS) and of him getting crohns disease which i also have. I can't even imagine how amazing it must be to BF your child without it being painful, if only :cry:

Aw, poor you Vicky. I hope it gets better for you, I really do. x
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,364
Messages
27,147,906
Members
255,802
Latest member
samaniego
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"