I thought it was quite a cheap shot mentioning the M5 crash. Horrible as it was, these kind of accidents are (mercifully) rare. It's *much* more common for impacts to be frontal - especially high speed ones. If a rear shunt is severe enough to impact on the child in the rear seat, then I can't see that the plastic back of a FF seat is going to do a great deal of good in terms of protection? And what the RF seat is protecting is the neck/spine, as it's not being thrown forward. A rear shunt wouldn't emulate those kind of forces - if I understand my physics correctly, then the only way to emulate the effects of a frontal crash on a FF child would be to reverse a car into something at high speeds with a child RF. Again, I don't think that happens all too often.
I also hate how people bang on about how the ERF seats are hard to fit. How are they difficult, exactly? Is it the tether straps? They are a footer, but not horrendously difficult. I'm not sure I buy into that guy's assertion that FF seats are easier to fit, ergo safer - if someone isn't going to take the time to read a manual to make sure the seat is fitted properly, it doesn't matter if it's FF or RF

Also, perhaps if ERF was more common, then there would be more places to get seats fitted professionally to start with
That page managed to rile me up, and I wouldn't say I'm particularly strongly opinionated about ERF, not anymore

I do it because it works for us, I'm happy to advise others on it, but I feel that each family has to assess what option is best for them when it comes to FF or not. For all that the site was saying it was being "balanced", I actually think it doesn't do either FF or ERF any favours
