This is certainly up for debate! I think some mothers do get "hoaxed" into thinking they are malnourishing their babies and that formula is the safe option. My antenatal midwife herself goes with other midwives into under-developed countries to promote BF (mostly in Africa, I live in South Africa). I commend them greatly. It's sad that these women don't have the resources to obtain invaluable knowledge and make concerted decisions. We are still very far behind in times when it comes to knowing our own bodies and what the body is capable of and these women feel they cannot provide what nature intended them to. I personally have some Nestle products because it suits us. I know I would have given up BF if it wasn't for the support of my midwife and a wonderful cousin who told me "it does get easier". Some women don't have this support. Sadly
TBH for me this isnt about bf v ff - its about the deliberate targeting that went on of women who werent in a position to know that they were being conned - and it was a con, those women werent told the free stuff would be withdrawn as soon as their babies were dependant on the formula. And I dont care how many years ago it was, it wasnt a mistake it was a marketing strategy.
Mizze xx
I didn't know about this but I am completely and absolutely appalled!
From my understanding, this happened in the 70's? Are they still doing it now?
If anyone is interested in reading more about nestle and the formula issue, I found this page explains it well: https://www.jemjabella.co.uk/2010/jemjabella-is-a-nestle-free-zone/
There is an image which may disturb, thought I'd better warn.
It seems to be an awful thing to do, those poor mothers being faced with such a situation! I see how the lack of knowledge led them to choose the formula. I am confused though wouldn't it be a bad marketing strategy since the company knows the mothers couldn't afford the formula afterward anyway?
What nestle did was disgusting. Im glad they dont sell their formula in the UK