I keep coming back to this one and just feeling utterly flabbergasted that anyone could see something so amazing as a negative thing. Regardless of how well you raise your child, it takes one moment, one slip of concentration on either of your parts and that child could dash into a road and be killed... people might choose to not use them... and that's fine. But to see something that could save lives as a negative thing? Baffled.
I see this similar to ERF v FF. Yes FF is fine and does it's job. However in certain situations that could happen outside of your control ERF IS safer and could save lives.
For what it's worth I FF... but if I were to put ERF down because I choose not to do it... people would be baffled I'm sure. Same goes for reigns.
To clarify before anyone misreads. Not making a like for like comparison - just using ERF/FF as an example here as a similar situation. FF, like not using a lead, is fine and children go through childhood perfectly fine and healthily FF'ing and not using leads. However some parents look at risks and choose to be more cautious to try and protect their child from any risk of harm. Those parents could go for ERF to protect their child in the small, minute chance of a crash that a FF carseat could not save their child from. This is no different to a parent assessing risks and choosing to use a lead in the small, minute chance that their child, no matter how well behaved, trips into the path or a car etc.
People that take extra care about risks shouldn't have their practices compared to something negative...and ANY tool that can protect a child from harm should be respected. Whether you use it or not. I FF... but I respect ERF carseats and acknowledge that they have their place xxx