adrie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 746
- Reaction score
- 3
We actually develop the reflex for a reason, and its main purpose is to learn how to correctly respond to stimuli. An infant and baby's ability to self sooth is important; not as if mom isn't there if need be.
Do you have any sources for that? Based on the research I've seen the most popular theory describes the reflex as a vestigial trait from the days whem our prehuman ancestors had to cling to their mothers as young infants. I've never heard about it teaching babies "how to correctly respond to stimuli," but I'd be interesting in reading about it if there's new information available.
I was actually paraphrasing what I have read and watched about the startle reflex. Yes, it is a primitive reflex. Essentially, at the beginning stages of development (the first months) the physical expression of the reflex is actually the result of baby's inability to control his or her limbs and as it integrates into later stages of development, the infant learns to control these reflexes, which indicates development of baby's central nervous system. I personally do not believe in inhibiting this reflex.
The quote I identified with is located in this article:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/lif...ats-the-new-parental-question/article4560252/
“Are you really supposed to be preventing the [startle reflex]? Is it not there as a protective mechanism?” Luther asked. “It keeps the engine going.”
Also, a video that better explains what I have just paraphrased in my response to you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdiCep6OStA