I would say that 6 months was fair (regardless of what was stolen) if the people causing damage were getting a year or whatever, but if others are causing damage and getting 10 weeks (so probably out in 5 weeks) then it does seem harsh, IMO. The people committing same/similar crimes should get same/similar sentences (obviously harsher for someone who has a history of crime/criminal record). The way I see it if I was getting six months for stealing, see someone else getting 10 weeks for damaging property, I would wonder why my sentence was so harsh and why I was being 'picked on', now if I already hated the system, then my anger would just build!