American ladies.. who do you think will win the election?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So you think paying for them to have 10 kids (that all grow up to be the same way) would be better. That's probably the majority of the reason we have the welfare mess. I've seen it equated many times to the signs to not feed the animals because they become dependent (and then can't take care of themselves nor their offspring). If we continue to let people have as many kids as they want and pay for them to live in basically the same lifestyle as the working middle class (minus the working part) we are doing NO ONE any favors. They need to have motivation to better themselves. If everything that those that work have is given to them (and sometimes more) what motivation do they have to better themselves or teach their children to be independent adults?

Really though how many people do you think chose to have ten children and chose never to work? I imagine it is a lot less than you think, and if your media is like ours (England) then a lot less than they want you to think too.

I agree it is not the norm, but it does happen. My MIL is 65 and her husband is disabled and can't work, she needs and does deserve medicaid but we choose to pay for her, some people do need the help.
 
I don't think it is fair to lump all people together, there are always going to be the ones that do cheat and lie but most really need it and deserve it, so they should not be made to suffer cause of the idiots..JMO:flower:
 
Can I be nosey and ask if she had pre-existing conditions that affected the price?

$350 really isn't all that high. If I wanted to add DH to my employers plan it would be $400/ month and he is healthy in every way.
 
I agree it is not the norm, but it does happen. My MIL is 65 and her husband is disabled and can't work, she needs and does deserve medicaid but we choose to pay for her, some people do need the help.

I have no doubt it happens, but I am not the sort of person who think oh the minority of people on welfare are milking the system so lets punish the majority. :nope:

Your MIL is lucky to have your support :kiss: but as you say there are so many people who dont have that or family cant give it for whatever reason. And those people have paid into the system for so many years, why should they not get the help now? Why should they sit at home poorly, wondering if they should go to the doctors and face the cost or sit at home getting worse and worse?

Sorry for the rant, it isnt aimed at you just a general sort of reply to the thread :flower:
 
I don't think it is fair to lump all people together, there are always going to be the ones that do cheat and lie but most really need it and deserve it, so they should not be made to suffer cause of the idiots..JMO:flower:

YES!!!! Exactly what I was meaning.
 
So you think paying for them to have 10 kids (that all grow up to be the same way) would be better. That's probably the majority of the reason we have the welfare mess. I've seen it equated many times to the signs to not feed the animals because they become dependent (and then can't take care of themselves nor their offspring). If we continue to let people have as many kids as they want and pay for them to live in basically the same lifestyle as the working middle class (minus the working part) we are doing NO ONE any favors. They need to have motivation to better themselves. If everything that those that work have is given to them (and sometimes more) what motivation do they have to better themselves or teach their children to be independent adults?

Really though how many people do you think chose to have ten children and chose never to work? I imagine it is a lot less than you think, and if your media is like ours (England) then a lot less than they want you to think too.

From the sampling I see (at least in our area) it is VERY prevalent. The more kids they have the more money they get, plus they have "disabled" kids and get SSDI checks for them! I've seen parents tell kids to act up in school so they can get their "crazy check" (term they use to describe SSDI benefits for kids).
 
I agree it is not the norm, but it does happen. My MIL is 65 and her husband is disabled and can't work, she needs and does deserve medicaid but we choose to pay for her, some people do need the help.

I have no doubt it happens, but I am not the sort of person who think oh the minority of people on welfare are milking the system so lets punish the majority. :nope:

Your MIL is lucky to have your support :kiss: but as you say there are so many people who dont have that or family cant give it for whatever reason. And those people have paid into the system for so many years, why should they not get the help now? Why should they sit at home poorly, wondering if they should go to the doctors and face the cost or sit at home getting worse and worse?

Sorry for the rant, it isnt aimed at you just a general sort of reply to the thread :flower:

I totally agree with you. My husband gets it taken out of his check every week for over 20 years so if he gets sick does he not deserve it, of course he does. You just cannot blame the whole bunch for what some idiots do, everyone I don't care who they are deserves healthcare and decent care provided/ :thumbup:
 
What happens if you get pregnant and can't afford to pay to have the baby? You just get the bill for 'X' amount and they expect you to pay it off? Is there a time limit like with loans?
 
So you think paying for them to have 10 kids (that all grow up to be the same way) would be better. That's probably the majority of the reason we have the welfare mess. I've seen it equated many times to the signs to not feed the animals because they become dependent (and then can't take care of themselves nor their offspring). If we continue to let people have as many kids as they want and pay for them to live in basically the same lifestyle as the working middle class (minus the working part) we are doing NO ONE any favors. They need to have motivation to better themselves. If everything that those that work have is given to them (and sometimes more) what motivation do they have to better themselves or teach their children to be independent adults?

Really though how many people do you think chose to have ten children and chose never to work? I imagine it is a lot less than you think, and if your media is like ours (England) then a lot less than they want you to think too.

From the sampling I see (at least in our area) it is VERY prevalent. The more kids they have the more money they get, plus they have "disabled" kids and get SSDI checks for them! I've seen parents tell kids to act up in school so they can get their "crazy check" (term they use to describe SSDI benefits for kids).

I have no doubt that is true, but I am sorry that is not the norm. That is crazy and what the hell are they teaching their kids?
 
Surely the SSDI payments arent as simple as acting up in school? There has to be diagnoses and they will contact teacher, doctors, therapists and anyone else involved in the childs care. It is a lot to expect a child to be able to act that. Now I am not saying it never happens but I dont think it happens that much.
 
It's so embarrassing when I see people equate socialism with every person having access to at least basic medical care. :dohh:

And I can't believe how incredibly selfish someone can be that they'd deny another person the right to live simply because they don't have enough money. It's not just lazy, purposely unemployed people who don't have insurance, plenty of employed people are uninsured as well. The same applies to many college students. And even if you are lazy and don't want to work? I'm still not comfortable with letting you die because of some unfortunate personality traits and lack of ambition. And more importantly, I'd rather see my money go towards saving someone's grandfather or daughter or brother than funding some ridiculous wars

So you think paying for them to have 10 kids (that all grow up to be the same way) would be better. That's probably the majority of the reason we have the welfare mess. I've seen it equated many times to the signs to not feed the animals because they become dependent (and then can't take care of themselves nor their offspring). If we continue to let people have as many kids as they want and pay for them to live in basically the same lifestyle as the working middle class (minus the working part) we are doing NO ONE any favors. They need to have motivation to better themselves. If everything that those that work have is given to them (and sometimes more) what motivation do they have to better themselves or teach their children to be independent adults?

Do you HONESTLY believe that 47% of the population has 10 or more kids and does not work?!
 
I don't think it is fair to lump all people together, there are always going to be the ones that do cheat and lie but most really need it and deserve it, so they should not be made to suffer cause of the idiots..JMO:flower:

Private organizations (churches, other social programs like Salvation Army) can help out those that truly need it. They are better at screening people and making sure people are only getting what they need and not scamming the system to pay for big screen tvs and game systems (and designer clothes/ jewelry/ cars/ etc.). Build shelters for multiple families where those that can't afford their own housing go to live (there is no reason for private housing). Provide soup kitchens and food banks to give out staples that people need to eat, so they don't trade their card benefits for cigarettes/ booze/ other things. People would never go truly without in the country even if there were no welfare system (I don't consider SS a welfare system if you've paid into it for years before you draw it either). The local church near me packs bag lunches and passes them out to the homeless. I try to give them a check at least every couple of weeks because 1) I feel the people aren't going to scam for a bag lunch as much as cash (especially when someone is going out and handing it directly to them on the street) and 2) they truly do need it and aren't being helped at all by our current government "social programs".
 
I imagine that the greater need wouldn't be able to be fufilled completely by private organisations, most charities and the like are over stretched as it is.

It sounds like you don't feel these families deserve their dignity, which is sad because even if you can't have compassion for the adults (who are may be poorly educated or they may be following previous generations) surely you can have some compassion for the children? Do they really deserve to live in a shelter with probably no privacy and making them likely targets for bullies? Do they deserve never to have treats like chocolate or clothese because of the choices their parents make?
 
To previous comment, yes my insurance is optional through work. Some " medications" aren't covered (like lactose free formula) so I pay that and get a discount. And glasses are covered. Stuff like that. I get a free pair every three years.
 
To previous comment, yes my insurance is optional through work. Some " medications" aren't covered (like lactose free formula) so I pay that and get a discount. And glasses are covered. Stuff like that. I get a free pair every three years.

Thank you for answering. In that case we have similar here, with optional extra insurance but doesn't tend to be through work.
 
I don't think it is fair to lump all people together, there are always going to be the ones that do cheat and lie but most really need it and deserve it, so they should not be made to suffer cause of the idiots..JMO:flower:

Private organizations (churches, other social programs like Salvation Army) can help out those that truly need it. They are better at screening people and making sure people are only getting what they need and not scamming the system to pay for big screen tvs and game systems (and designer clothes/ jewelry/ cars/ etc.). Build shelters for multiple families where those that can't afford their own housing go to live (there is no reason for private housing). Provide soup kitchens and food banks to give out staples that people need to eat, so they don't trade their card benefits for cigarettes/ booze/ other things. People would never go truly without in the country even if there were no welfare system (I don't consider SS a welfare system if you've paid into it for years before you draw it either). The local church near me packs bag lunches and passes them out to the homeless. I try to give them a check at least every couple of weeks because 1) I feel the people aren't going to scam for a bag lunch as much as cash (especially when someone is going out and handing it directly to them on the street) and 2) they truly do need it and aren't being helped at all by our current government "social programs".

:dohh:

So churches and charities (who depend on hand outs...how ironic) are better equipped to find out who deserves help and who doesn't?

Giving out packed lunches to the homeless is hardly the same as helping to provide millions of struggling people with the basic necessities they need to survive. Once again, you are stereotyping those in receipt of benefits and expecting us all to believe that they are all smokers/drinkers who waste their coupons and welfare on big tv's and other luxuries.
 
The idea of bunging all the needy in some form of separate 'ghetto shelter' for the poor is segregation at its very worst! Firstly, how is that anyway to reward the elderly? People who have worked hard in their life, and now...in their twilight years...are deemed too much of a burden on mult millionaire Romneys system, so are bunged in a shelter. What about people who are unwell are cant work? What about people who want, desperately, to work? What about people caring for disabled family members? terminally ill? what about people with disabilities? How, also, do you ever expect people to break that cycle of poverty? All you do in enforcing that kind of segregation is build a vicious cycle of poverty. Nothing more.

People deserve dignity. Help. Chances. Support.

Of course there are people who scam the system. This is something the Government needs to act on, and I would applaud any President or Prime Minister that could do that. More money for the truly in need would be excellent. What I could not and would not support, is anyone who would take out their frustrations at the inadequacy of a welfare system on those who need it the most. It's inhumane.

Also, churches and charities do not have the funds to support the most needy! Not by a long stretch! Yes, good will can supply soup kitchens for the homeless...I give clothes, food, Christmas presents and toys to our local charities...but this doesn't change lives! It's just a bit of help. These people need an infrastructure of support that has money, Government support and policy behind it.

It truly makes me incredibly sad to read that there are so many people in this world who have so little compassion for their fellow man. 'There but by the grace of god go we' is something we could all listen to...
 
Great post TG. It worrys me when people try and "tar" people the same. Oh yes lets just make one big house to put the unemployed, hand them scraps and basicly give them no rights, heck soon you wont be able to vote if you dont work (sure some people would want that if they could!).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,308
Messages
27,144,970
Members
255,759
Latest member
boom2211
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->