Donating money to disaster charities.

I think sometimes as donors, we may have unrealistic expectations as to how quickly we should see results. I donated for the Haiti one and I don't bother with thinking about how my money was spent because I tend to trust that they are doing their best in what I can only imagine is a logistical minefield. The alternative is to not give, and that doesn't bear thinking about. Charities have to be registered and regulated so Id assume you could ask for how funds are allocated?
 
You also 'ring-fence' your donation if you want it to go to a specific activity. Thing is though, if everyone did that there'd probably be no money for core things like staff, volunteer expenses, travel, admin etc. I think sometimes people feel their money should go directly to the subjects but forget that people and things, however mundane, are part of what makes good stuff happen.
 
Absolutely - staff that work for charities and NGO's tend to be very highly qualified people who bring alot of invaluable assets (not just "admin") to the table and they need to be paid. No staff = no charity = no aid. I would love to personally deliver my aid directly to the victims but that is not viable in any way. For the most part, they are doing their best.
 
I totally understand and agree what you are both saying, but looking at Haiti, for example, and you see the 'staff/admin' may have been paid but nothing much has been done in terms of helping those that need it.

I dont usually donate then 'wonder' where my £1/£5/£10 may have gone, it was only through watching this programme that the penny dropped and I thought "hang on a min, where DOES my money actually go? I'd love to see a breakdown sometimes, especially when you dont hear/see much being done on the news etc" I suppose if something had been done already I might not have questioned it.

I do appreciate all the other fee's that are not necessarily seen to the eye, but it made me wonder :flow:

:)
 
Well I have you a breakdown from DEC. Do you remember who you donated to?
 
We donate mainly to Uk based charities and organisations, but we also donate to Islamic relief (part of the DEC) not just because they are a Muslim charity but because in the past at least they didn't used to advertise or do mailshots (sadly they started doing this recently; which is disappointing) and their costs and overheads for running the charity were low, also with them you can specify more which projects/items your money is going to pay for than with some charities. I do also donate to charity shops such as oxfam etc.
 
I also think people have unrealistic expectations of how much things cost. It costs a lot to ship water, medicine, food. I used to work for a company that used to ship Aid supplies and you would be shocked at how much it costs to ship enough water for 1000 people for just a week. We are often talking about water for 10s of thousands and we are talking over a year. Places like Haiti have severe infrastructure issues. This makes transportation costs far more expensive that otherwise would have been as most things cannot be shipped entirely by land, they must be shipped by air. The country was leveled in the earthquake. It is likely that most of the towns/cities will be abandoned rather than rebuilt just because of the sheer scale of the effort and the lack of money in that country.

Haiti has a lot of other problems too. It has been the centre of corruption for years and it's not all the fault of the Haiti government. The US have had a massive hand in it too. Their history is pretty pitiful. The people there know nothing but eeking out an existence and fighting among each other. It makes Haiti a dangerous country and getting aid out problematic.

Japan's a little different. Japan has similar problems where getting aid to hard hit areas is difficult because of the damage. However the country has a lot of infrastructure in place already, we are already seeing them hard at work repairing buildings, roads, cleaning up. Hundreds of thousands of people were displaced and the costs of feeding them is exorbitant. You can see you aid money at work each time you see a displaced persons centre on the TV.

It's interesting to point out though, that while people complain about the UK being able to give money yet it has a deficit to cover, Kabul donated $50,000 in Aid to Japan after the Earthquake. It doesn't sound like much, but Afghanistan is one of the poorest countries in the world. It can barely feed it's own population, and yet with an out pouring of sympathy for the humanitarian crisis that happened in Japan, they still managed to find something to donate. It speaks of the human spirit I think.

We don't donate as much as we should. I tend to like organisations like https://www.kiva.org/ which is more about getting people in the third world on their feet by providing them with a full or partial loan, to support their business. It gives a better sense of satisfaction and you can see your donation at work. I also like https://www.presentaid.org/ which means you can actually physically purchase something with your money. It probably just gets swallowed into a big hole but it is something a little bit more substantial than just giving money.
 
Thank you for that, it was a very interesting reply :)

Will take a look at those sites xx
 
all I'm going to say on the matter is that IMO charity starts at home, not where the latest natural disaster was.

ETA: we give a monthly donation to the NSPCC
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,307
Messages
27,144,891
Members
255,759
Latest member
boom2211
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->