O
Ozzieshunni
Guest
hot tea, I think you're reading too much into her post. This is a debate not an interrogation.
You like it, but why do you think you like it? Is it because by your nature as an animal? Or is it societal influence? What is you, what has been imprinted? Is it fair to imprint the same on your children, tell them what is right and wrong based solely on something preconcieved and doesn't actually exist on a natural level?
Not read through the rest of this due to chronic case of laziness but here's my thoughts on it. I think there are differences between men and women in general terms and I think that the differences are animalistic and part of our genetics, for want of a better way of putting it. Basically, I think that perhaps men are/were more naturally aggressive and things like that, whereas women were perhaps naturally more nurturing. I'm not sure how far this goes as I'm not a natural historian, but you do, however, see replicated images of early humans where the women also hunted. There have been studies to show that there are differences between genders, just as there are small differences between the vast majority of cultural and genetic groups. Four year old boys, for example, have been proven to have a surge of testosterone for a few years and are therefore generally more boisterous than girls of their age. Such differences can be found through all age groups and if we must generalise, as we often do, then many differences will be found.
I do, however, think that it is wrong to generalise based on gender to the point of segregation. It is ridiculous in this day and age to assume that most influential factor of a child's personality is his or her gender, disregarding, or certainly belittling, all other contributing factors. We all throw around the phrase "everyone should be treated as an individual", but often, in the case of our children, we don't see it that way. People often say that want a boy or a girl when pregnant, for example. What if they had two boys, and one was very stereotypically girly and the other typically boyish? Surely that would satisfy the parents' ideals? It's never seen that way though, stereotyping begins in the womb. I'm not explaining myself very well, sorry, I'm tired! I think too much importance is put on gender. In a world where cross-dressing (why the hell is it even called that?!), sex changes and open sexuality are the norm, why are the so many questions concerning the reproductive organs someone was born with? It seems ridiculous and completely irrelevant. In that way, I don't exactly believe in gender. I don't really believe in sexuality either, but that's a different matter!
As far as how I'll treat my son, yes, I do sort of hope he has an obsession with dinosaurs and trains, but I would also be delighted if he enjoyed playing with a tea set or with my old doll house. Now that he's a baby I do enjoy dressing him in boyish clothes, but to be honest I'm not a fan of girly clothes and I'd have trouble dressing a girl from the girl's section in shops. When he's older, however, if he wants to wear a skirt and it's weather appropriate then I'll let him. If he chooses to wear glitter and a fairy costume and it's practical then that's fine. My OH is different, but I think that as LO grows up he'll allow him to do whatever makes him happy. I can honestly say that as long as my LO is happy and not endangering himself then he can be gay/transgender/dress in 'girl's' clothes as much as he likes.
San Mateo County. Loved every minute of it!