Bournefree
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,420
- Reaction score
- 0
The risk of infection is exactly the same.
However, when weighing up the whole situation for the baby in a nut shell is;
a preterm baby is "safer" in mum than out regardless of the infection risk (of course it needs monitoring), as there is a developmental risk. Where as term or post term developmental risk isn't there, but there is an increase in a risk of the placenta not maintaining functionality along side a risk of infection.
So that is the general reasoning.
Maybe I didn't word it right (or maybe your comment had nothing to do with mine), but I wasn't implying that the risk of infection for either gestation was different at all. I was saying that: with the risk of infection vs the risk of pre-term delivery with the 27 weeker, the pre-term delivery was the greater risk; whereas with the risk of infection vs the risk of an induced term delivery (even though, as we know, they may not be ready as we see it), the risk of infection is the greater risk.
No, no!! I think we must have posted at the same time - didn't even see yours, as we are saying the same thing, Hahahaha!