Feeble, I was interested in finding out more and how flexible schooling would work. I think I is unfortunate that the discussion has to come down to you telling me not to kid myself. I haven't dismissed your standpoint but you have mine. I had a genuine interest but I don't need told that my colleagues and I are failing children. I can look around my school any day and see this is simply not the case.
Having taught in the State School sector for a lot of years I have very clear and up to date picture of what happens today. In Scotland class sizes are much smaller they were 30 years ago when I was at Primary for example.
Over and out for me. If I want to hear how I must be failing in my job and how the system I believe in and fight for is useless then I can read the Daily Mail.
I am really sorry i have made you feel that way.
i disagree though, you have been incredibly negative from the start about 'allowing' a child to be flexi schooled and i would be very surprised if anything changed your mind about it...
regardless of that, i have not meant to offend you and i am sorry x
I am my own worst enemy. I cannot let things lie.
Feeble, I am not negative about flexible schooling but I cannot see how it would work successfully. That is why I was questioning you/ others about the practicalities. People can be negative about something/ dubious of its merits and change their mind when the other side is explained. Personally I don't think you can be in education and be unwilling to change your mind.
I am really unsure why people would choose this approach. I am still unclear what the benefits are. Most homeschoolers I have known have been confident that they are able to address the need for social interaction through clubs or meetings with others using the same approach and that their child is learning in a better environment. With this in mind I am not sure why someone would choose this approach? As I tried to explain, for me as a primary teacher I can see an awful lot of pitfalls such as the fact that my timetable is not set in stone meaning that there is no guarantee which areas of the curriculum will be accessed. I would think that aspect is easier in secondary school where timetables are followed.
But you have been negative about flexi schooling, you have repeatedly expressed that it wouldn't work for you when all I am wondering about is how well it could work for a child!
I think taking the opportunity to homeschool is a massive thing, you are saying you will 100% be in control of a child's education which is daunting for many, whereas with flexi schooling you are still following the schools teaching guidance, you are just offering personalised, one on one care with your own child rather than having them constantly be part of massive classes where perhaps disruptive children get all the attention (and let's make no mistake, they need it) and the teachers are unsupported and though (and everyone on this thread has said this) doing their best but perhaps fighting a loosing battle at times.
It should always be what works best for the child, we should not hinder their development because a teacher does not wish to cooperate (which, I am sorry, is 100% the attitude I received from your posts) there are circumstances where a child is part-time in school and, in many cases, it's incredibly beneficial for the school and the child.