Kate McCann releasing a book...

[anna matronic]

The one thing that I can say about the book is that it can only do more good than it can harm. If it raises more money to continue searching for her and puts Maddy's face out in the public eye again that is great.

I am glad that you mum's on here are being sensitive and cautious to what you post on here concerning this case. Even if this lady (Kate) has made the biggest mistake of her life -surely people can forgive her and support her pleas to find her little girl? It is easy to get caught up in who is to blame and lose sight of what is important.

I came across an article that has a positve outlook for the book:

The article is on canidoit - Just type in Kate McCann in the search bar.

I cannot post the direct link on here.

ERM...... NO
For me, I will never forgive what her and her husband (the smarmy git) did. They made a conscious decision to leave their children open to danger at the very least.
Yes, I would love to find Madeleine, but I will never ever forgive her or support her

Totally agree. I have no sympathy for them whatsoever, this was their fault so they can deal with the guilt.

I really hope they do find Maddy though, and find out what actually happened.

This thread must be showing in google results now, it was only a matter of time before their "followers" joined and said sOmething.

Read the evidence, how can a book do more good than bad?! Especially when she is quoting the evilness that she is.

yep this is a new member and this is their only post?!?!?!? ever!!!

no i cannot forgive them. their actions that night are to blame!!! if they did something then then are defo to blame and if they did not and she was abducted then they are still to blame for leaving her and the twins alone at night. esp after reports of them crying the previous evening!?!?!?!?! i to think its all incredibly strange and suspicious and dont belive some of what they are saying!!! And in all cases does it not usually 9 times out of 10 turn out that the person guilty is the person closest to the victim???

Each to their own but, I don't subcribe to the idea that we have to forgive people just because they may regret their actions. I dont think Kate & Gerry genuinely regret theirs - I think they regret the outcome, but not the decision. If I believed their story, I still wouldn't forgive them. I don't think they deserve forgiveness. Their daughter has, as far as I'm concerned, paid the ultimate sacrifice, and I don't think they should, or can, ever be forgiven for that, whatever their involvement.

People usually only regret there actions when something goes wrong or they get found out. For example, people who have affairs do not feel guilty about it. They DO feel guilty of course when they get found out. So they didn't feel guilty about leaving their kids and wouldn't have done if nothing happened to Maddy. They only feel guilty about it afterwards because the f*ucked up.

What interview is that can someone link me?

I think they agreed to the dogs etc because they know shes dead but wanted it to look like Maddie was taken and killed by a stranger, so they are in the clear.??

https://www.rte.ie/player/#v=1098327
Here - they are on at about 1:16....

I haven't finished yet, but at 1:20 Gerry is talking about Madeleine as a baby and how beautiful she was and "how they loved her to [pause] bits"

Anyone else think he was going to say "loved her to death"? I mean that is a common saying when you say you love someone to death... but it may have some meaning here!!

 

[Samemka]

Loved - don't they love her anymore then?

I know they probably said loved because they were reflecting on the past & so said 'loved' thinking of that but once again, bad choice of words.

 

[Tasha]

They keep saying baby listening service, but then at 1.28 Kate corrects herself to baby checking service. I think that is quite telling, and that if they checked at all, it was always outside the room to hear if any of them cried, if not they just walked away, never actually seeing the LO's

 

[going_crazy]

They keep saying baby listening service, but then at 1.28 Kate corrects herself to baby checking service. I think that is quite telling, and that if they checked at all, it was always outside the room to hear if any of them cried, if not they just walked away, never actually seeing the LO's

I've thought this all along..... Who's to say that the rest of the Tapas 9 who were supposed to physically check on the children, only popped over and listened to see if they were crying or not..... Apparently one of the couples were using a baby monitor - wouldn't something be heard on that if there was a 'break-in' and an abduction, or were they not staying near each other?

 

[Quackquack99]

The one thing that I can say about the book is that it can only do more good than it can harm. If it raises more money to continue searching for her and puts Maddy's face out in the public eye again that is great.

I am glad that you mum's on here are being sensitive and cautious to what you post on here concerning this case. Even if this lady (Kate) has made the biggest mistake of her life -surely people can forgive her and support her pleas to find her little girl? It is easy to get caught up in who is to blame and lose sight of what is important.

I came across an article that has a positve outlook for the book:

The article is on canidoit - Just type in Kate McCann in the search bar.

I cannot post the direct link on here.

ERM...... NO
For me, I will never forgive what her and her husband (the smarmy git) did. They made a conscious decision to leave their children open to danger at the very least.
Yes, I would love to find Madeleine, but I will never ever forgive her or support her

Totally agree. I have no sympathy for them whatsoever, this was their fault so they can deal with the guilt.

I really hope they do find Maddy though, and find out what actually happened.

This thread must be showing in google results now, it was only a matter of time before their "followers" joined and said sOmething.

Read the evidence, how can a book do more good than bad?! Especially when she is quoting the evilness that she is.

yep this is a new member and this is their only post?!?!?!? ever!!!

no i cannot forgive them. their actions that night are to blame!!! if they did something then then are defo to blame and if they did not and she was abducted then they are still to blame for leaving her and the twins alone at night. esp after reports of them crying the previous evening!?!?!?!?! i to think its all incredibly strange and suspicious and dont belive some of what they are saying!!! And in all cases does it not usually 9 times out of 10 turn out that the person guilty is the person closest to the victim???

Each to their own but, I don't subcribe to the idea that we have to forgive people just because they may regret their actions. I dont think Kate & Gerry genuinely regret theirs - I think they regret the outcome, but not the decision. If I believed their story, I still wouldn't forgive them. I don't think they deserve forgiveness. Their daughter has, as far as I'm concerned, paid the ultimate sacrifice, and I don't think they should, or can, ever be forgiven for that, whatever their involvement.

People usually only regret there actions when something goes wrong or they get found out. For example, people who have affairs do not feel guilty about it. They DO feel guilty of course when they get found out. So they didn't feel guilty about leaving their kids and wouldn't have done if nothing happened to Maddy. They only feel guilty about it afterwards because the f*ucked up.

What interview is that can someone link me?

I think they agreed to the dogs etc because they know shes dead but wanted it to look like Maddie was taken and killed by a stranger, so they are in the clear.??

https://www.rte.ie/player/#v=1098327
Here - they are on at about 1:16....

I haven't finished yet, but at 1:20 Gerry is talking about Madeleine as a baby and how beautiful she was and "how they loved her to [pause] bits"

Anyone else think he was going to say "loved her to death"? I mean that is a common saying when you say you love someone to death... but it may have some meaning here!!

To me it seems that gerry was trying his best to carefully think about what to say. We usually pause in mid sentence to prevent ourselves from saying something we shouldn't. It seems too calculated for me.

 

[LoraLoo]

Loved - don't they love her anymore then?

I know they probably said loved because they were reflecting on the past & so said 'loved' thinking of that but once again, bad choice of words.

I find that odd too, because even now, when i talk about Eve, I say I LOVE her, she IS beautiful etc rather than the past tense, and they dont even, supposedly, know if Maddie is dead or not

 

[Tasha]

going_crazy they were all in a line but I dont know if it would of picked any nosie from say two or three apartments away.

All I hear is more and more lies, now they say this was the only night they were back in the apartment by 11 but we know that isnt true according to Mrs Fenn's account of Maddie crying and them returning after 11pm previously

 

[TattiesMum]

No one in high authority has said anything because they all know the truth and there all freemasons also!

And for the record freemasons are just a bunch of people who like to beleive they are more important than they really are. Someone close to me very nearly joined the freemasons (due to a familial connection of mine and one of my family members is one!). Its just keeping money within money and thats all there is to it. I dont think its fair to tar the freemasons with the perverted child abuser brush.

I think with a lot of these secret societies (and even some religions) that there are very different 'levels' of membership the ordinary members are indeed just usually businessmen who look out for each other in terms of contracts/money etc... however I do believe that the higher up in these organisations you go the 'heavier' it gets iykwim

I don't know if you remember or have heard of the Dunblaine massacre? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_massacre But there are some really iffy connections with freemasonry there https://www.intmensorg.info/dunblane.htm . In Scotland in particular rumours of freemason paedophile rings involving top judges, police etc have been doing the rounds for years - just google Scottish Freemason Paedophile and you'll see what I mean

Hello to a fellow Lutonian by the way :wave::wave:

 

[Tasha]

Loved - don't they love her anymore then?

I know they probably said loved because they were reflecting on the past & so said 'loved' thinking of that but once again, bad choice of words.

I find that odd too, because even now, when i talk about Eve, I say I LOVE her, she IS beautiful etc rather than the past tense, and they dont even, supposedly, know if Maddie is dead or not

I do that too hun for both Honey and Riley Rae

 

[Tasha]

I am really confused I thought that Kate McCann signed Madeleine out of the creche, but in the interview (132/133) she says that they go from creche to have high tea by the tapas bar, and when she got back from her run they were already there with Gerry

 

[purpledahlia]

I just watched the interview, Thing that makes me think its odd is because she was talking about the door and how they leave it almost closed, But then she said she noticed it was open and how maybe matt left it open more, Then the gush of wind slammed the door shut, If that window had been open for say 30mins since the last ''check'' there must have been lots of 'gushes of wind' if there had been 2 in the short space kate was in the room? So surely it would have slammed the door shut before she turned up? and surely slamming doors wakes kids?

 

[purpledahlia]

I am really confused I thought that Kate McCann signed Madeleine out of the creche, but in the interview (132/133) she says that they go from creche to have high tea by the tapas bar, and when she got back from her run they were already there with Gerry

that is odd...

 

[Nut_Shake]

Been reading evryones replies on this thread, really finding it all so fascinating and terrible and quite scary tbh.

I think we should all keep an eye on each other, make sure none of us mysteriously start disappearing as we seem to be delving rather deep, and especially if we are now google searchable... Haha!

 

[Tasha]

I just watched the interview, Thing that makes me think its odd is because she was talking about the door and how they leave it almost closed, But then she said she noticed it was open and how maybe matt left it open more, Then the gush of wind slammed the door shut, If that window had been open for say 30mins since the last ''check'' there must have been lots of 'gushes of wind' if there had been 2 in the short space kate was in the room? So surely it would have slammed the door shut before she turned up? and surely slamming doors wakes kids?

Yes, you are right. They must think people are stupid

 

[Tasha]

Been reading evryones replies on this thread, really finding it all so fascinating and terrible and quite scary tbh.

I think we should all keep an eye on each other, make sure none of us mysteriously start disappearing as we seem to be delving rather deep, and especially if we are now google searchable... Haha!

I will have more nightmares

 

[going_crazy]

Been reading evryones replies on this thread, really finding it all so fascinating and terrible and quite scary tbh.

I think we should all keep an eye on each other, make sure none of us mysteriously start disappearing as we seem to be delving rather deep, and especially if we are now google searchable... Haha!

I will have more nightmares

No more eating cheese then!

 

[anna matronic]

I just watched the interview, Thing that makes me think its odd is because she was talking about the door and how they leave it almost closed, But then she said she noticed it was open and how maybe matt left it open more, Then the gush of wind slammed the door shut, If that window had been open for say 30mins since the last ''check'' there must have been lots of 'gushes of wind' if there had been 2 in the short space kate was in the room? So surely it would have slammed the door shut before she turned up? and surely slamming doors wakes kids?

What an excellent point The weather was rubbish and it was cold, the wind gushed through twice in a few mins so deffo would have before she got back. (not sure why I am saying that as it never happened in the first place... Gosh even I am believing her now and refuting her claims.)

I am really confused I thought that Kate McCann signed Madeleine out of the creche, but in the interview (132/133) she says that they go from creche to have high tea by the tapas bar, and when she got back from her run they were already there with Gerry

that is odd...

There have been discussions of the creche book being forged.. I can't remember the exact story behind this though and they analysed Kates writing in comparison with what is in the book and they are very different.

I must admit I had a minute of thinking that maybe a staff member (or staff member helped) someone abduct her using a key. (slap me now for thinking this!!!!!!!!!!!)

 

[Tasha]

 

[purpledahlia]

Yeh one of the links said the writing was forged... to cover up the fact she was already gone maybe?

 

[purpledahlia]

oooh 7 guests reading.... they're onto us!