Thats what i find odd.
Why only take one child?
Thats what i find odd.
Why only take one child?
thats wot i think !
also why take the oldest? the most likely to resist
If the parents did accidently kill her though (lets say an OD) the twins would have been there when they were getting rid of the body wouldnt they (hate saying that it makes me feel sick but cant think of a better way of putting it) but Im sure they wouldnt have actually killed the other 2 so they couldnt tell anyone iykwim? Guess they would just have banked on them being too young to tell anyone or remember x
also why take the oldest? the most likely to resist
i said that & she could speak!
If the parents did accidently kill her though (lets say an OD) the twins would have been there when they were getting rid of the body wouldnt they (hate saying that it makes me feel sick but cant think of a better way of putting it) but Im sure they wouldnt have actually killed the other 2 so they couldnt tell anyone iykwim? Guess they would just have banked on them being too young to tell anyone or remember x
I guess the twins would be too young or asleep.
I know everyone reacts differently to the loss of a child but the fact that they didnt pull the twins close always made me wonder. They travelled alot to the US and pope (i think) but i dont think the twins went with them.
I wouldnt ever let my kids out of my sight if one was taken
they were too little to remember, or they could of been asleep? Even if she was dead (hate to say it) they could of easily just carried her to the bathroom/another room so the twins could see and put her body in a bag.. By the time they could say proper things the twins wouldn't of remember it anyway!