Petition for changes to Child Benefit to be more fair

Meredith2010

Mum of 2 perfect babies
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

As some of you will know, it is proposed that in January 2013 Child Benefit will be cut to households that have at least one higher rate tax payer. However, the household could have two people earning £1 less than the higher rate cut off and would still get the benefit.

I.E. A household with a stay at home parent and one working parent with a household income of £44k would have their child benefit removed.

BUT a household with BOTH parents earning £42k therefore a household income of £84k would STILL receive the benefit.

Fair?

I don't necessarily agree with Child Benefit being paid to any family that doesn't need it, and yes it is arguable that if a household has an income anywhere near £40k then this benefit isn't needed. HOWEVER, if the Government are going to remove it then it needs to be removed fairly. It should be means tested and done on TOTAL household income, not the income of one person.

If you could take a few seconds to sign the petition below it would be much appreciated. Any petitions with more than 100000 signatures can be debated in the House of Commons.


https://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/714

I'm not looking for a debate on this and if you don't agree then that's fair enough - don't sign the petition!

xxxx
 
Signed.

These proposals are totally unfair.

TBH I think the cut off should be a higher and be joint household income.

Households with only one parent working and the other a stay at home parent are penalised enough as it is.

If you consider one person earning £50k and 2 earning £25k their household income is much more as they pay less tax & NI. One parent should be encouraged to stay at home and families should be given some incentives for one parent to stay at home. How many mums/dads go out to work 'cos they can't afford not to?

Sorry to high jack and rant but these things really cheese me off.
 
Personally I don't understand why they're doing it this way, every other benefit is assessed on household income, so it's not like they can't do it that way.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,308
Messages
27,145,006
Members
255,759
Latest member
boom2211
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->