O
Ozzieshunni
Guest
No, I was just clarifying. Thank you hun!
The guy who tweeted during the class (not that THAT is a distraction....) only did so after she started feeding the child, why not when he first went it. And he later tweeted "...I don't do feminism, I'm a pro-male chauvinism type guy #makemeasandwich"
...and yet is is the professor who is considered wrong?
......So it's the student's fault now?
For me the issue isn't that she breastfed but there seems to be a determination to make it about that, its that she took a child, who was sick, to her place of work WHILST she was supposed to be teaching students, who pay thousands for their education and deserve her full attention.
For me the issue isn't that she breastfed but there seems to be a determination to make it about that, its that she took a child, who was sick, to her place of work WHILST she was supposed to be teaching students, who pay thousands for their education and deserve her full attention.
And that's a totally fair stance to take from a personal perspective HOWEVER the news headline isn't that "Woman takes sick toddler to work"
The news clearly is attempting to make the issue that she breastfed.
If by cultural you mean nationality then I don't think it is. There is not a clear divide between posters on each side of the Atlantic.Perhaps this is one of those cultural things again.....
If by cultural you mean nationality then I don't think it is. There is not a clear divide between posters on each side of the Atlantic.Perhaps this is one of those cultural things again.....
The guy who tweeted during the class (not that THAT is a distraction....) only did so after she started feeding the child, why not when he first went it. And he later tweeted "...I don't do feminism, I'm a pro-male chauvinism type guy #makemeasandwich"
...and yet is is the professor who is considered wrong?
......So it's the student's fault now?
I think the point being made there was rather that someone who is taking time to "tweet" isn't exactly "focused" to be distracted... this is why its laughable to me that some are trying to say she "forced" the students to watch her. Half the time students are watching a powerpoint presentation, texting, tweeting, checking facebook, or if they're actually listening then they've got their head down, and are writing notes.
Have you not noticed a majority of breastfeeding women say this is unprofessional?! Babies have NO place in a lecture hall. None. If your students are distracted too bad. In my university we were graded on paying attention as well as test scores and professors took cell phones til the end of class or kicked out students using them.
And I am in the US. I know how bad maternity leave is. That doesn't mean she can use her classroom as a sick ward. Obviously she wasn't paying much attention to her sick child if she got a paper clip in her mouth and a student pointed it out. Which meant the student wasn't paying attention to to lecture.
Get over the breastfeeding. Child shouldnt be there. Not professional. Who cares if it's one lecture. Students are still paying for it not paying for the mom to look after her sick child.
If a professor can't devote her attention to what she's being paid for she shouldn't be teaching. There's plenty of people willing to take her place in the US right now who would give 100%
I'm not sure where I stand on the issue, and I haven't disagreed with your previous posts. But you are now starting to get very angry and insistent and rather cruel.
First, the bit in red. Who determines that babies have no place in the classroom? Is it a rule? Did you create that rule and therefore have first hand knowledge of it? From what I recall there was no disciplinary action taken on the teacher, nor do I recall a statement from the administration on their stance on the issue. The fact is that a university can be a lax environment, professors grade how they wish without anyone enforcing standards or expect them to teach in a cookie cutter way. So bringing her child to work is clearly not illegal. If she does it often, she may get a talking to.
The blue bit - how do you know the student was not paying attention to class? It's possible to pay attention to one thing and have your gaze averted from something else. Unless you can prove that the students were not paying attention in the class then it's arbitrary to claim that they didn't.
About the students paying for the class. Typical consumer entitlement. More and more in America I'm hearing the same kind of sentiment, "I'm paying for this! Do it right! This is MY time!" Just because we pay for something doesn't mean we get to control it, then more we continue to think this way the more this country finds itself in a rut. I don't even know where or how this type of mentality started and it's a shame it dictates everyone now.
Do you really believe that this mother is incapable of doing her job well or not able to focus? You think this is something she should be fired for? Do you want to throw stones at her as well or is stripping her of her livelihood so that someone more worthy can get the job is enough punishment?
And if either of these scenarios were the ones in question, I would agree the parents should not have their children there. But just because it doesn't suit in some situations, doesn't mean it shouldn't be done by anybody. It depends on the child and the job. I work from home sometimes and yes, if I have to have my head down in something very involved, I arrange for someone to take care of Abby. If I needed to go into the office to do it, I wouldn't take her as a boredom prone attention seeking three year old. But I did take her as a sleepy one year old. Mostly my working from home consists of answering emails and writing reports, if I need peace I tell her so, start her off with a game or activity and carry on with what I need to do. I've taken her to meetings with heads of hospitals and with politicians and she sat in and everyone was delighted to have her there. Would I take her to a make or break negotiation with a top client? Not a chance. But as a professional person I'm more than capable of making that distinction, as is this lecturer.No I don't live in the dark ages, I'd say I was being realistic.
For my job, actually it would not be possible to take my child into work at all. It would be highly unprofessional. I work in mental health & take many phone calls from people who are wanting to refer to deal with their depression. Now I'm sorry but I cannot say half way through a conversation "Thanks for phoning us, I know you want to talk to someone about your depression but my one year old has just ran off with the stapler, can I call you back?"
My DH works on a blast furnace & deals with molten steel...I highly doubt it would be possible for him to take a sick child to work & still be able to do his job.
So I stand by my original point of the child should not have been at work with her in the first place.
But foogirl, only you would be distracted by your LO. Not an entire classroom as well.