Guppy....would they offer to try and turn baby over there? If so would you opt for that? x
It is offered, however, I may not be such a good candidate for it because i have severe pelvic organ prolapse and it could cause issues, but also because the baby is more than likely in the position that she is in because of the prolapse (another idea was cord entanglement). Could be one, could be both. But it appears that the failure rate is pretty high, as it is, but it's even higher in transverse cases (compared to breech) AND it has an even higher failure rate with someone w my condition.
If i didn't have severe prolapse and if she were breech, as oppsed to sideways, i probably would attempt it, but at this point i dont feel the risk is worth it given my health condition.
Ive been doing everything humanly possible to get her to turn. Occasionally she goes head down but never stays there for long (a couple of hours, maybe). I never had this in my other two pregnancys. (before i had bad prolapse) I really think she is that way because it's the safest way for her to be (and bc my organs are not in the proper place which is probably contributing greatly).
My MWs said it would be an option, but based on my reading of them, it would seem that it likely wouldn't work for my case. Especially given how many weeks ive been trying to turn her and given that ive been getting Websters Technique and chiro done regular without any sucess at all (Apparently Websters is loads more successful than ECV).
So yes, it is an option, but im not personally comfortable with it because of my risk factors (compared to mothers without these issues) especially with such a high failure rate and such a risk to the baby, reguardless.