The Drs should definitely allow it. Your UK like me My last was a messy ugly induction ending in C/S and when I had the meeting with the consultant he said they preferred mums to go natural as it was a better recovery for mum, considering this is my 11th child, 1st vbac, I thought I was gonna have a fight on my hands to even let me try but was relieved in how supportive he was
p.s. I will be refusing any drips this time.
It really depends on you and how the baby is doing leading up to and/or at the time of labour. I had a c-sect with my first, and wanted to go vbac with my second. The one OB at the hospital "warned" me against vbac (I had already well-educated myself about it) and wanted to induce me the next morning (this was 2 days past my due date and my fluid levels were on the low side). I freaked out since I've heard how that road often leads to c-section anyway (AND more painful labour). I ended up going into labour naturally that night - but still needed a section since there were issues with the baby's heartbeat and I wasn't dilating. In the end, having the section probably saved his life.
So I think in principle yes VBAC is probably doable for sure (if there's been over a year between this and the last birth). But if risks increase at the moment of labour then a c-section is going to be more likely. I know it sucks, but just try to mentally prepare for that in case it needs to happen.
Since I've already had 2 I'm almost certainly going to have to have a third section with this baby
Good luck!
It really depends on you and how the baby is doing leading up to and/or at the time of labour. I had a c-sect with my first, and wanted to go vbac with my second. The one OB at the hospital "warned" me against vbac (I had already well-educated myself about it) and wanted to induce me the next morning (this was 2 days past my due date and my fluid levels were on the low side). I freaked out since I've heard how that road often leads to c-section anyway (AND more painful labour). I ended up going into labour naturally that night - but still needed a section since there were issues with the baby's heartbeat and I wasn't dilating. In the end, having the section probably saved his life.
So I think in principle yes VBAC is probably doable for sure (if there's been over a year between this and the last birth). But if risks increase at the moment of labour then a c-section is going to be more likely. I know it sucks, but just try to mentally prepare for that in case it needs to happen.
Since I've already had 2 I'm almost certainly going to have to have a third section with this baby
Good luck!
My situation is similar to yours Vickylou, for my first birth I was adamant i didn't want a c section. I had to be induced at 14 days over and after 24 hours labour baby was still at a -3 station (hadn't dropped into the birth canal) so I had to have an emcs. I then had a major pp heammorage.
I had a follow meeting with the consultant and she said it all happened because of my babies position and the chances of it happening again were very slim. She said she would be very happy for me to have a vbac as long as I went into labour spontaneously and as long as labour progressed well. If I go overdue, a deadline will be set for c section, I will not be allowed to be induced again (I think because if my bleed). Similarly if I go into labour and don't progress it will be c section.
Hope this helps? I haven't decided yet wether to go for elective section and have no risk of a bleed (I was in intensive care away from my baby for 24 hours) or wether to try a vbac and hope it goes smoothly. Good luck whatever you decide. Xx
Is that year from getting pregnant again or giving birth? I gave birth in November 2014 and got caught again roughly November /December 15? Last pregnancy I wasn't open to a csection at all, I closed my mind off to it and told everyone, doctors, midwifes my birth partners under no circumstances do I want a section or intervention. I was gutted when I was told I needed a section after getting to 7cm then going back to 3cm in minutes. I didn't even know that was possible. That's when they decided it was time to get her out. I will have to be open to the idea this time but I really would like to go natural, no pessarys, no drips and no pain relief.
Thank you x
Is that year from getting pregnant again or giving birth? I gave birth in November 2014 and got caught again roughly November /December 15? Last pregnancy I wasn't open to a csection at all, I closed my mind off to it and told everyone, doctors, midwifes my birth partners under no circumstances do I want a section or intervention. I was gutted when I was told I needed a section after getting to 7cm then going back to 3cm in minutes. I didn't even know that was possible. That's when they decided it was time to get her out. I will have to be open to the idea this time but I really would like to go natural, no pessarys, no drips and no pain relief.
Thank you x
I'm pretty sure I'll need a section again just because I've had 2. My last section was Feb. 2014 and this baby's due July 2016 so the timing is fine... in Europe I was told to wait a minimum of 1 year to get pregnant again and I was beyond that.
Birth in Nov. 2014 - Dec. 2015 (for conception) is probably OK I would think, but different countries/hospitals have different "rules". Like previous posters have said it should be up to you - at least if you are in the hospital then if something does go wrong and intervention is needed, the chances are that things will work out OK.
Wow I didn't think that was possible either - dilating and then undilating so quickly? :-0
With my #2 baby since I was already having some strong contractions a few mins apart they ended up giving me something to stop the contractions before operating. It didn't completely work though, lol! But all ended up fine in the end.
For the record my 2nd c-section recovery was much better than my first! Maybe that's why I'm slightly more open to it now than I was with baby #2.