Those who dont let you lo see/watch the tv...

I think the Hitler analogy is a little extreme, frankly. Hitler assumed control of the media, and whilst I believe that our government has some say on what we read, see and hear (Murdoch and his cronies being a good example of this) we are very fortunate to have a relatively 'free speech' media. I am, I like to think, in possession of a decent enough mind to enjoy programmes such as Question Time, Newsnight etc, all of which challenge thinking, challenge gvt decisions and rake over the news as reported in the media. To assume that all those in possession of a television sit slack jawed in front of tat is a huge, and somewhat condescending, generalisation. For sure, I like my fair share of tat...but I also enjoy more challenging programmes. I also thoroughly enjoy some of the finer dramas, such as Spooks. Have you ever watched BBC4? is there something wrong with watching Wallander, or the life of Haydn? Televisions isn't just sex, guns, drugs and rock and roll!

I want my children to be informed, and part of being informed is, in this day and age, via the
television. I will also expect them, as we do, to challenge what they read and see, and not blindly accept it. If I read The Mail (which I don't!) I know it will report a story in a completely different way to The Guardian (which I do read) I can challenge BOTH!

I fully expect to bring them up to be interested in world issues, in the same way both my husband and I are. Just because we watch a bit of Strictly does not mean I am not concerned about wars or the potential collapse of the euro.

Life should not, however, always be about learning...and where there is a family appropriate show such as Strictly Come Dancing, I will happily let my kids watch when they are old enough.

Besides, if I look hard enough, I can see lion faces in the clouds...! I am sure subliminal messaging is used, but I don't think it is really all that subversive in films such as The Lion King.

As I write, my eldest is watching In The Night Garden, and I think it is a perfectly appropriate programme for a two year old.
 
I think the Hitler analogy is a little extreme, frankly. Hitler assumed control of the media, and whilst I believe that our government has some stance on what we read, see and hear (Murdoch and his cronies being a good example of this) we are very fortunate to have a relatively 'free speech' media. I am, I like to think, in possession of a decent enough mind to enjoy programmes such as Question Time, Newsnight etc, all of which challenge thinking, challenge gvt decisions and rake over the news as reported in the media. To assume that all those in possession of a television sit slack jawed in front of tat is a huge, and somewhat condescending, generalisation. For sure, I like my fair share of tat...but I also enjoy more challenging programmes. I also thoroughly enjoy some of the finer dramas, such as Spooks. Have you ever watched BBC4? is there something wrong with watching Wallander, or the life of Haydn? Televisions isn't just sex, guns, drugs and rock and roll!

I want my children to be informed, and part of being informed is, in this day and age, via the
television. I will also expect them, as we do, to challenge what they read and see, and not blindly accept it. If I read The Mail (which I don't!) I know it will report a story in a completely different way to The Guardian (which I do read) I can challenge BOTH!

I fully expect to bring them up to be interested in world issues, in the same way both my husband and I are. Just because we watch a bit of Strictly does not mean I am not concerned about wars or the potential collapse of the euro.

Life should not, however, always be about learning...and where there is a family appropriate show such as Strictly Come Dancing, I will happily let my kids watch when they are old enough.

Besides, if I look hard enough, I can see lion faces in the clouds...! I am sure subliminal messaging is used, but I don't think it is really all that subversive in films such as The Lion King.

As I write, my eldest is watching In The Night Garden, and I think it is a perfectly appropriate programme for a two year old.

yes but havent you noticed that Iggle Piggle is subliminally telling your child not to eat their veggies?????:haha::haha::haha:
 
i know you all would rather watch the television than read. but i highly suggest you fully read this before you make any more smart comments or laugh at me. Until you read this and let me know what you think, i will not be taking any of you seriously anymore.

I know you don't like staring at long strands of motionless text, and I know it's a struggle for you to analyze and comprehend the meaning of complex sequences of words. But if you give me just a few minutes, I will let you in on a little secret that marketers and governments have been relying on for decades. That television you watch every day, your secret best friend, is an addictive opiate, and not only that, it's one of the most potent mind control devices ever produced. And I'm not just basing this on intuition. I have the neurological evidence to prove it.

Although the definitions are vague and somewhat misleading, the word "addiction" usually refers to a psychological or physical dependence on a particular experience that must be repeated in order for a person to be comfortable. Usually, we think about this in terms of chemical addiction, which occurs when the addict's chemical of choice reorganizes the nervous system so that it requires the presence of that chemical to operate smoothly.

Of course, not all addictions are chemical. Any behavior that leads to a pleasurable experience will be repeated , especially if that behavior requires little work. Psychologists call this pattern "positive reinforcement" . This is what we mean, technically speaking, by addiction. In this sense, television certainly fits into the category of an addictive agent.

When you watch TV, brain activity switches from the left to the right hemisphere. In fact, experiments conducted by researcher Herbert Krugman showed that while viewers are watching television, the right hemisphere is twice as active as the left, a neurological anomaly. The crossover from left to right releases a surge of the body's natural opiates: endorphins, which include beta-endorphins and enkephalins. Endorphins are structurally identical to opium and its derivatives (morphine, codeine, heroin, etc.). Activities that release endorphins (also called opioid peptides) are usually habit-forming (we rarely call them addictive). These include cracking knuckles, strenuous exercise, and orgasm. External opiates act on the same receptor sites (opioid receptors) as endorphins, so there is little difference between the two.

In fact, strenuous exercise, which produces the nominal "runner's high"- a release of endorphins that flood the system, can be highly addictive, to the point where "addicts" who abruptly stop exercising experience opiate-withdrawal symptoms, namely migraine headaches. These migraines are caused by a dysfunction in opioid receptors, which are accustomed to the steady influx of endorphins.

Indeed, even casual television viewers experience such opiate-withdrawal symptoms if they stop watching TV for a prolonged period of time. An article from South Africa's Eastern Province Herald (October 1975) described two experiments in which people from various socio-economic milieus were asked to stop watching television. In one experiment, several families volunteered to turn off their TV's for just one month. The poorest family gave in after one week, and the others suffered from depression, saying they felt as though they had "lost a friend." In the other experiment, 182 West Germans agreed to kick their television viewing habit for a year, with the added bonus of payment. None could resist the urge longer than six months, and over time all of the participants showed the symptoms of opiate-withdrawal: increased anxiety, frustration, and depression.

The signs of addiction are all around us. The average American watches over four hours of television every day, and 49% of those continue to watch despite admitting to doing it excessively. These are the classic indicators of an addict in denial: addicts know they're doing harm to themselves, but continue to use the drug regardless.

Recent studies on laboratory rats show that opioid-receptor stimulants induce addictive behaviors. The evidence is conclusive: all opioids are addictive! Even the ones your body produces naturally. The television set works as a high-tech drug delivery system, and we all feel its effects. The question is, can an addiction to television be destructive? The answer we receive from modern science is a resounding "Yes!"

First of all, when you're watching television the higher brain regions (like the midbrain and the neo-cortex) are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower brain regions (like the limbic system). The neurological processes that take place in these regions cannot accurately be called "cognitive." The lower or reptile brain simply stands poised to react to the environment using deeply embedded "fight or flight" response programs. Moreover, these lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a job performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real, releasing appropriate hormones and so on. Studies have proven that, in the long run, too much activity in the lower brain leads to atrophy in the higher brain regions.

It is interesting to note that the lower/reptile/limbic brain correlates to the bio-survival circuit of the Leary /Wilson 8 Circuit Model of Consciousness. This is our primal circuit, the base "presence" that we normally associate with consciousness. This is the circuit where we receive our first neurological imprint (the oral imprint), which conditions us to advance toward anything warm, pleasurable and/or protective in the environment. The bio-survival circuit is our most infantile, our most primal way of dealing with reality.

A person obsessed with the pursuit of physical pleasure is probably fixated on this circuit; in fact the Freudians believed an opium addiction was an attempt to return to the womb. We could logically deduce that such addictions occur when higher brain functions are anesthetized and the newly dominant lower brain seeks out pleasure at any cost. Taking this into account, television is like a double edged sword: not only does it cause the endocrine system to release the body's natural opiates (endorphins), but it also concentrates neurological activity in the lower brain regions where we are motivated by nothing but the pursuit of pleasure. Television produces highly functional, mobile "bio-survival robots."

Herbert Krugman's research proved that watching television numbs the left brain and leaves the right brain to perform all cognitive duties. This has some harrowing implications for the effects of television on brain development and health. For one, the left hemisphere is the critical region for organizing, analyzing, and judging incoming data. The right brain treats incoming data uncritically, and it does not decode or divide information into its component parts.

The right brain processes information in wholes, leading to emotional rather than intelligent responses. We cannot rationally attend to the content presented on television because that part of our brain is not in operation. It is therefore unsurprising that people rarely comprehend what they see on television, as was shown by a study conducted by researcher Jacob Jacoby. Jacoby found that, out of 2,700 people tested, 90% misunderstood what they watched on television only minutes before. As yet there is no explanation as to why we switch to the right brain while viewing television, but we do know this phenomenon is immune to content.

For a brain to comprehend and communicate complex meaning, it must be in a state of "chaotic disequilibrium." This means that there must be a dynamic flow of communication between all of the regions of the brain, which facilitates the comprehension of higher levels of order (breaking conceptual thresholds), and leads to the formation of complex ideas. High levels of chaotic brain activity are present during challenging tasks like reading, writing, and working mathematical equations in your head. They are not present while watching TV.

Levels of brain activity are measured by an electroencenograph (EEG) machine. While watching television, the brain appears to slow to a halt, registering low alpha wave readings on the EEG. This is caused by the radiant light produced by cathode ray technology within the television set. Even if you're reading text on a television screen the brain registers low levels of activity. Once again, regardless of the content being presented, television essentially turns off your nervous system.

In addition to its devastating neurological effects, television can be harmful to your sense of self-worth, your perception of your environment , and your physical health. Recent surveys have shown that 75% of American women think they are overweight, likely the result of watching chronically thin actresses and models four hours a day.

Television has also spawned a "culture of fear" in the U.S. and beyond, with its focus on the limbic brain-friendly sensationalism of violent programming. Studies have shown that people of all generations greatly overestimate the threat of violence in real life. This is no shock because their brains cannot discern reality from fiction while watching TV.

Television is bad for your body as well. Obesity, sleep deprivation, and stunted sensory development are all common among television addicts.

So I hope we've firmly established that television is an addictive drug, one that is no better than opium, heroin, or any other opiate. Television is just as (and possibly even more) harmful to the body-brain as every other drug. But there's one big difference. All other drugs apparently pose a threat to the established social order. Television, however, is a drug that is actually essential to maintaining the social infrastructure. Why? Because it brainwashes consumers to throw money at the gaping void of their meaningless, terror-filled lives. And by brainwashed, I mean they've been hypnotized using very subtle and established techniques which, when coupled with television's natural effects on brain waves, make for the most ambitious psychological engineering ruse ever concocted.

Psychophysiologist Thomas Mulholland found that after just 30 seconds of watching television the brain begins to produce alpha waves , which indicates torpid (almost comatose) rates of activity. Alpha brain waves are associated with unfocused, overly receptive states of consciousness. A high frequency alpha waves does not occur normally when the eyes are open. In fact, Mulholland's research implies that watching television is neurologically analogous to staring at a blank wall.

I should note that the goal of hypnotists is to induce slow brain wave states. Alpha waves are present during the "light hypnotic" state used by hypno-therapists for suggestion therapy.

When Mulholland's research was published it greatly impacted the television industry, at least in the marketing and advertising sector. Realizing viewers automatically enter a trance state while watching television, marketers began designing commercials that produce unconscious emotional states or moods within the viewer. The aim of commercials is not to appeal to the rational or conscious mind (which usually dismisses advertisements) but rather to implant moods that the consumer will associate with the product when it is encountered in real life. When we see product displays at a store, for instance, those positive emotions are triggered . Endorsements from beloved athletes and other celebrities evoke the same associations. If you've ever doubted the power of television advertising, bear this in mind: commercials work better if you're not paying attention to them!

An addictive mind control device . . . what more could a government or profit-driven corporation ask for? But the really sad thing about television is that it turns everyone into a zombie, no one is immune. There is no higher order of super-intelligent, nefarious beings behind this. It's the product of our very human desire to alter our state of consciousness and escape the hardships of reality .

While AdBusters has their highly ineffectual TV Turnoff Week , I'd like to announce a campaign of my own. Starting next week, we will celebrate what I like to call TV Pawn-Off Week. I encourage you all to sell your televisions, and use the money to buy some books .

We're living in a Brave New World , only it's not so brave, or even that new. In fact, it's starting to look more and more like the Dark Ages, with the preliterate zombie masses obeying the authority of the new clergy: Regis Philbin and Jerry Springer .
 
Momma cat- I think If you want everyone to read your novel and take your arguement in you should really think again before beginning it by insulting everyone... Anyway that said I'm off to watch eastenders!
 
I am appalled that anyone can make such a rude generalisation, mommacat. I suggest you read others posts before making these wild assumptions. There is just no need to be so rude. I've done you the courtesy of reading your posts and countering your opinions with polite debate. I suggest you do the same to others.
 
Unfortunately it appears that it is you that hasn't read or 'listened' to what we have all been saying. Everybody here has expressed their views that tv is just another activity that they will offer their children and nobody has admitted to letting their child sit for 5 hours a day watching anything they want.
You clearly think you are way above us all. I am a teacher and I love to read. I read book after book. I read to my LO and I have plenty of experience and training to know how to encourage my daughter to learn and how to enjoy reading so do not say be so rude as to assume I cannot understand a 'sequence of words'.
You seem to have nothing better to do than read 'research'. I like to find gain my evidence from real life- from the children I have taught at school and my own at home.
You are very presumptuous in your attitude. You believe all our tv watching children are just like the individuals in the 'research' you have read.
Wi think I can speak for others....
We do not care about your 'evidence'. I pretty much guarantee if I had the time or the inclination I could find evidence that rules yours out! You're right on one thing- couldn't be bothered to read your shpeil because its boring and I already know better.

You didn't answer my questions.
Ever watched tv?
Walk around with your eyes shut?
Cinema?
Theatre?
Radio?
Magazines?
Life?

I think there is lot more to your views than simple tv. You clearly are hung up on a lot of issues. You clearly see wrong in a lot of things- and I see it as such a shame. Tv isn't really that bad come on..... Bit of x factor never hurt anyone... Although I would LOVE you to find some evidence to prove me wrong... And while you're at it- what harm could 'the snowman' do- thinking of watching it tomorrow.
 
First of all, thanks for insulting us.

Second, No one was laughing at YOU. When I made the laughing post, I was laughing at those ridiculous videos you posted from youtube as part of your argument, when there were so many misspelled words from the producers of the clips. Do you really want me to take that seriously?

Do you want me to take you seriously? Then get off of your high horse, stop offending, and listen to what others are saying, too.
 
Well said nosocks :) (along the same lines that I would have liked to have said had I not been in the bath on my iPhone :) )
 
My lo watches tv for a very short time then gets bored so not much of an issue for us
 
While there are illegal wars going on in libya, and the middle east, the economy is falling apart, ya'll are sitting home watching Dancing with the Stars.

How are we suppose to keep up on the war in libya? How were we suppose to keep up on the overthrowing of Gaddafi? How were we suppose to know what was going on in Egypt when the riots were going on? If there was no media coverage, no one would have known anything that was going on AT ALL! for one, watch the news daily, read newspapers and keep track of things like that.

So, please tell me how we are suppose to keep up on things around the world if there is NO media.
 
i know you all would rather watch the television than read. but i highly suggest you fully read this before you make any more smart comments or laugh at me. Until you read this and let me know what you think, i will not be taking any of you seriously anymore.

I know you don't like staring at long strands of motionless text, and I know it's a struggle for you to analyze and comprehend the meaning of complex sequences of words. But if you give me just a few minutes, I will let you in on a little secret that marketers and governments have been relying on for decades. That television you watch every day, your secret best friend, is an addictive opiate, and not only that, it's one of the most potent mind control devices ever produced. And I'm not just basing this on intuition. I have the neurological evidence to prove it.

Although the definitions are vague and somewhat misleading, the word "addiction" usually refers to a psychological or physical dependence on a particular experience that must be repeated in order for a person to be comfortable. Usually, we think about this in terms of chemical addiction, which occurs when the addict's chemical of choice reorganizes the nervous system so that it requires the presence of that chemical to operate smoothly.

Of course, not all addictions are chemical. Any behavior that leads to a pleasurable experience will be repeated , especially if that behavior requires little work. Psychologists call this pattern "positive reinforcement" . This is what we mean, technically speaking, by addiction. In this sense, television certainly fits into the category of an addictive agent.

When you watch TV, brain activity switches from the left to the right hemisphere. In fact, experiments conducted by researcher Herbert Krugman showed that while viewers are watching television, the right hemisphere is twice as active as the left, a neurological anomaly. The crossover from left to right releases a surge of the body's natural opiates: endorphins, which include beta-endorphins and enkephalins. Endorphins are structurally identical to opium and its derivatives (morphine, codeine, heroin, etc.). Activities that release endorphins (also called opioid peptides) are usually habit-forming (we rarely call them addictive). These include cracking knuckles, strenuous exercise, and orgasm. External opiates act on the same receptor sites (opioid receptors) as endorphins, so there is little difference between the two.

In fact, strenuous exercise, which produces the nominal "runner's high"- a release of endorphins that flood the system, can be highly addictive, to the point where "addicts" who abruptly stop exercising experience opiate-withdrawal symptoms, namely migraine headaches. These migraines are caused by a dysfunction in opioid receptors, which are accustomed to the steady influx of endorphins.

Indeed, even casual television viewers experience such opiate-withdrawal symptoms if they stop watching TV for a prolonged period of time. An article from South Africa's Eastern Province Herald (October 1975) described two experiments in which people from various socio-economic milieus were asked to stop watching television. In one experiment, several families volunteered to turn off their TV's for just one month. The poorest family gave in after one week, and the others suffered from depression, saying they felt as though they had "lost a friend." In the other experiment, 182 West Germans agreed to kick their television viewing habit for a year, with the added bonus of payment. None could resist the urge longer than six months, and over time all of the participants showed the symptoms of opiate-withdrawal: increased anxiety, frustration, and depression.

The signs of addiction are all around us. The average American watches over four hours of television every day, and 49% of those continue to watch despite admitting to doing it excessively. These are the classic indicators of an addict in denial: addicts know they're doing harm to themselves, but continue to use the drug regardless.

Recent studies on laboratory rats show that opioid-receptor stimulants induce addictive behaviors. The evidence is conclusive: all opioids are addictive! Even the ones your body produces naturally. The television set works as a high-tech drug delivery system, and we all feel its effects. The question is, can an addiction to television be destructive? The answer we receive from modern science is a resounding "Yes!"

First of all, when you're watching television the higher brain regions (like the midbrain and the neo-cortex) are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower brain regions (like the limbic system). The neurological processes that take place in these regions cannot accurately be called "cognitive." The lower or reptile brain simply stands poised to react to the environment using deeply embedded "fight or flight" response programs. Moreover, these lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a job performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real, releasing appropriate hormones and so on. Studies have proven that, in the long run, too much activity in the lower brain leads to atrophy in the higher brain regions.

It is interesting to note that the lower/reptile/limbic brain correlates to the bio-survival circuit of the Leary /Wilson 8 Circuit Model of Consciousness. This is our primal circuit, the base "presence" that we normally associate with consciousness. This is the circuit where we receive our first neurological imprint (the oral imprint), which conditions us to advance toward anything warm, pleasurable and/or protective in the environment. The bio-survival circuit is our most infantile, our most primal way of dealing with reality.

A person obsessed with the pursuit of physical pleasure is probably fixated on this circuit; in fact the Freudians believed an opium addiction was an attempt to return to the womb. We could logically deduce that such addictions occur when higher brain functions are anesthetized and the newly dominant lower brain seeks out pleasure at any cost. Taking this into account, television is like a double edged sword: not only does it cause the endocrine system to release the body's natural opiates (endorphins), but it also concentrates neurological activity in the lower brain regions where we are motivated by nothing but the pursuit of pleasure. Television produces highly functional, mobile "bio-survival robots."

Herbert Krugman's research proved that watching television numbs the left brain and leaves the right brain to perform all cognitive duties. This has some harrowing implications for the effects of television on brain development and health. For one, the left hemisphere is the critical region for organizing, analyzing, and judging incoming data. The right brain treats incoming data uncritically, and it does not decode or divide information into its component parts.

The right brain processes information in wholes, leading to emotional rather than intelligent responses. We cannot rationally attend to the content presented on television because that part of our brain is not in operation. It is therefore unsurprising that people rarely comprehend what they see on television, as was shown by a study conducted by researcher Jacob Jacoby. Jacoby found that, out of 2,700 people tested, 90% misunderstood what they watched on television only minutes before. As yet there is no explanation as to why we switch to the right brain while viewing television, but we do know this phenomenon is immune to content.

For a brain to comprehend and communicate complex meaning, it must be in a state of "chaotic disequilibrium." This means that there must be a dynamic flow of communication between all of the regions of the brain, which facilitates the comprehension of higher levels of order (breaking conceptual thresholds), and leads to the formation of complex ideas. High levels of chaotic brain activity are present during challenging tasks like reading, writing, and working mathematical equations in your head. They are not present while watching TV.

Levels of brain activity are measured by an electroencenograph (EEG) machine. While watching television, the brain appears to slow to a halt, registering low alpha wave readings on the EEG. This is caused by the radiant light produced by cathode ray technology within the television set. Even if you're reading text on a television screen the brain registers low levels of activity. Once again, regardless of the content being presented, television essentially turns off your nervous system.

In addition to its devastating neurological effects, television can be harmful to your sense of self-worth, your perception of your environment , and your physical health. Recent surveys have shown that 75% of American women think they are overweight, likely the result of watching chronically thin actresses and models four hours a day.

Television has also spawned a "culture of fear" in the U.S. and beyond, with its focus on the limbic brain-friendly sensationalism of violent programming. Studies have shown that people of all generations greatly overestimate the threat of violence in real life. This is no shock because their brains cannot discern reality from fiction while watching TV.

Television is bad for your body as well. Obesity, sleep deprivation, and stunted sensory development are all common among television addicts.

So I hope we've firmly established that television is an addictive drug, one that is no better than opium, heroin, or any other opiate. Television is just as (and possibly even more) harmful to the body-brain as every other drug. But there's one big difference. All other drugs apparently pose a threat to the established social order. Television, however, is a drug that is actually essential to maintaining the social infrastructure. Why? Because it brainwashes consumers to throw money at the gaping void of their meaningless, terror-filled lives. And by brainwashed, I mean they've been hypnotized using very subtle and established techniques which, when coupled with television's natural effects on brain waves, make for the most ambitious psychological engineering ruse ever concocted.

Psychophysiologist Thomas Mulholland found that after just 30 seconds of watching television the brain begins to produce alpha waves , which indicates torpid (almost comatose) rates of activity. Alpha brain waves are associated with unfocused, overly receptive states of consciousness. A high frequency alpha waves does not occur normally when the eyes are open. In fact, Mulholland's research implies that watching television is neurologically analogous to staring at a blank wall.

I should note that the goal of hypnotists is to induce slow brain wave states. Alpha waves are present during the "light hypnotic" state used by hypno-therapists for suggestion therapy.

When Mulholland's research was published it greatly impacted the television industry, at least in the marketing and advertising sector. Realizing viewers automatically enter a trance state while watching television, marketers began designing commercials that produce unconscious emotional states or moods within the viewer. The aim of commercials is not to appeal to the rational or conscious mind (which usually dismisses advertisements) but rather to implant moods that the consumer will associate with the product when it is encountered in real life. When we see product displays at a store, for instance, those positive emotions are triggered . Endorsements from beloved athletes and other celebrities evoke the same associations. If you've ever doubted the power of television advertising, bear this in mind: commercials work better if you're not paying attention to them!

An addictive mind control device . . . what more could a government or profit-driven corporation ask for? But the really sad thing about television is that it turns everyone into a zombie, no one is immune. There is no higher order of super-intelligent, nefarious beings behind this. It's the product of our very human desire to alter our state of consciousness and escape the hardships of reality .

While AdBusters has their highly ineffectual TV Turnoff Week , I'd like to announce a campaign of my own. Starting next week, we will celebrate what I like to call TV Pawn-Off Week. I encourage you all to sell your televisions, and use the money to buy some books .

We're living in a Brave New World , only it's not so brave, or even that new. In fact, it's starting to look more and more like the Dark Ages, with the preliterate zombie masses obeying the authority of the new clergy: Regis Philbin and Jerry Springer .

well i managed to read and understand your reply, suprisingly...and i still think your talking a load of crap.

Did you know that you can watch tv and also read books????shocking, i know.

Its funny because out of all the people on this thread that sit in front of a TV like a "zombie", you are the dumbest of the lot.
 
Also the rudest,maybe turn the tv on abit and find out how real life people talk to eachother rather than talking down to them thinking u know it all like a character in a book when clearly u have nothing better to do then copy and paste information off of the Internet,I could find information saying reading books can give u cancer if I look hard enough....and stop watching those video clips,that's tv u know!
 
I rarely have the tv on when LO is awake. I figure that he'll have lots of time to watch it when he's older.
 
You are not wrong or right- that's the thing. You think you're right but you're not.
I respect the fact you don't want a tv in your life and you need to be respectful to those that do want tv in theirs instead of shoving evidence and research down our throats.
I grew up in a family where tv was present. I have fond memories of sitiing down with my family to watch a show- just as I do with friends and I like the thought of repeating it with my new family. I also have memories of playing outside, reading, riding, playing the clarinet, going on family holidays. I remember having lots of fun. Tv was a tiny part of my life.

I completely respect your decision- please respect mine. you think it's terrible but you are not necessarily correct- it is your opinion. You want your children to have the same I guess and so you can control them but I don't think you'll change our minds.
No-one is saying all children must watch tv- we just said we are happy for ours to- with different boundaries we my have.
 
wow, mommacat... I am an AVID reader but I could barely get through your tirade. It honestly is still the biggest load of crap I've read. ANY activity that is pleasurable can become addictive. There are people who addicted to collecting figurines, people addicted to piercings and tattoos, people who are addicted to giving to charity. You even mentioned the addictive nature of exercise! Not all addictions are 'bad'!

In referencing self esteem issues you said it's " likely the result of watching chronically thin actresses and models four hours a day." Its poor logic like that which make most of what you are saying very hard to take as fact. Its your OPINION which you support with vague references to studies. Did you know that often the conclusions drawn from studies are vastly misunderstood by people who are not experts in that field? drawing a conclusion from a study requires you to actually understand how the study was run, who the pool of participants were and how controls were kept in place.

I watch a LOT of TV... but I also read a LOT of books. I also knit, I cook, I sew and do many other crafts.

TV is not a 'mind control' device. Its not evil in-and-of-itself. Its simply a tool that has some good things and some bad things about it.

I'm not ok with children under the age of 2 watching TV but after that, reasonable amounts are fine.
 
mommacat - did you also know that one of your videos showing subliminal messages is made by two people called Mark and Dave? im sure they havent done any scientific studies.

and looking back at your essay, you have blatently copy and pasted it!
 
Ironic really, TV = BAD, highly addictive, advertisements, subliminimal messages blah de blah but the Internet......you know that thing that is known for having no adverts, all information is pure fact etc....well that is obviously deemed ok since you (MommaCat) are using it. :shrug:
 
You are not wrong or right- that's the thing. You think you're right but you're not.
I respect the fact you don't want a tv in your life and you need to be respectful to those that do want tv in theirs instead of shoving evidence and research down our throats

I completely respect your decision- please respect mine. you think it's terrible but you are not necessarily correct- it is your opinion. You want your children to have the same I guess and so you can control them but I don't think you'll change our minds.
No-one is saying all children must watch tv- we just said we are happy for ours to- with different boundaries we my have.

You are telling me that it is only my "opinion" yet you are contradicting yourself afterwards by saying i am shoving Evidence and research down your throats. Since when did evidence and opinion become the same thing? No one else is presenting any facts to prove what i am saying is wrong. i would really love to see it. So far, I have been called "dumb", i've been told what i'm saying is a "load of crap" , have been told i am sheltering my child in a bubble, and my posts have been laughed at without any counter evidence as to why..

I'm not judging you for putting your children in front of the television. its a free world and obviously you can do as you'd like. i am just presenting you with FACTS, as to why i choose not to do it.

So please, debunk the following statement:

Watching television changes your brain chemistry.


here is the evidence i have to back up my above statement:
Psychophysiologist Thomas Mulholland found that after just 30 seconds of watching television the brain begins to produce alpha waves , which indicates torpid (almost comatose) rates of activity. Alpha brain waves are associated with unfocused, overly receptive states of consciousness. A high frequency alpha waves does not occur normally when the eyes are open. In fact, Mulholland's research implies that watching television is neurologically analogous to staring at a blank wall.

I should note that the goal of hypnotists is to induce slow brain wave states. Alpha waves are present during the "light hypnotic" state used by hypno-therapists for suggestion therapy.

White -How are we suppose to keep up on the war in libya? How were we suppose to keep up on the overthrowing of Gaddafi? How were we suppose to know what was going on in Egypt when the riots were going on? If there was no media coverage, no one would have known anything that was going on AT ALL! for one, watch the news daily, read newspapers and keep track of things like that.

I myself do not watch mainstream news or read mainstream newspaper, magazines or any of the like, yet i find that i am still informed on such issues. (i read several alternative news websites, alternative news magazines, not owned by the same 5 corporate entities as i have mentioned above) i also would just prefer NOT to recieve my information (subliminal, or not) while in a hypnotic trance.


Ever watched tv? Yes, i have, what a waste of time.
Walk around with your eyes shut? nope
Cinema? used to, i now have better things to do with my time.
Theatre? i've seen a play or two, still i'd rather be out in nature.
Radio? not mainstream
Magazines? not mainstream
Life? is there not more to life than television? What are you implying? That i do not have a life because i do not subject myself to mainstream media?


Nosocks, you are asking me to bebunk you, so here, i will present you with even more information, taken from another source. you are asking me to debunk you, yet, then you say that you are not even going to bother reading my "shpiel" hmmm....You can get the full article at the link below.

Although, i do want to apologize for saying none of you like to read. that was wrong of me. I suppose i was just becoming frustrated as a lot of you are asking questions on topics i have already answered in the information i have posted. Sorry again. lost my cool there for a min.

The frontal lobe also alters in the brain when watching television. The frontal lobe is an important part of the brain as it is a management type system ensuring that our self-control, moral judgment and attention is planned, organised and sequenced. The concern is that the frontal lobe may be damaged by watching television and this may happen in childhood because the frontal lobe is in a continual stage of development until around 20 years of age.

When children watch television, the frontal lobe is not doing anything with the result that over a period of time this part of the brain doesn't develop which can then stunt development. A study in The World Federation of Neurology outlined concerns about the impact of visual electronic media (including television) on children because of stunted frontal lobe development which also impacts on their ability to control antisocial behaviour. Playing and interacting with others is recommended to encourage the fibres in the frontal lobe to develop and thicken and to make stronger connections to neurons.

It is not the information itself that causes the problem, but rather the medium. Somehow we are electrically wired to the television enabling information to be absorbed – any information. The medium induces within us a passive state for communication. If we are unconsciously absorbing information, then what is this information doing to the way we think and act? Of course, the medium is a perfect match for advertisers.

How much are we influenced by the opinions of others presented on TV? Ask how you came by that opinion – was it someone else's opinion that you've unconsciously accepted. Is your view of the latest international news event – consider the Russia vs Georgia crisis – shaped by what you hear? For example, I started to believe what I was hearing regarding this 'crisis' (ie that one country was the problem), until I was reminded of the history and other related events. Do you find yourself arguing forcefully about an issue then wondered how, or even why, you had that point of view?

The other aspect of television to consider is the amount of negative information that is transmitted. There are a few stories that are uplifting and empowering. Some groups recommend staying away from television particularly the news because of what they see as it's potential to negatively impact on enthusiasm, positive thinking, and self esteem. Do an experiment and stop watching television for a few days or a week, then assess how you feel in general. Once you start watching television again, reassess.

While we may look after our physical body, eating well and exercising, we also have a duty to look after our mental body, feeding it with positive stimulation. In a positive environment, we become positive, influencing others to be positive.

Learn more: https://www.naturalnews.com/024530.html#ixzz1gMD389Yf


 
I should also point out that many of those underhanded 'tactics' are also used in designing their packaging.. .using colors that are shown to make people hungry for food packaging etc. But I'm assuming you eat only organic vegetables and nothing out of a box, right?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,307
Messages
27,144,916
Members
255,759
Latest member
boom2211
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->