Am i being unreasonable? Or are these 'good' pictures? *Updated!*

Jadey121

Mummy of 2. Expecting No3
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
2,974
Reaction score
0
I went to babybond on Saturday to have my 4d scan and i came home and i just cried the images in my eyes are terrible! :( Whats your opinion on these pictures?

https://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y112/Lil-L/BABYBOND_10.jpg


https://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y112/Lil-L/BABYBOND_9-1.jpg


https://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y112/Lil-L/BABYBOND_8.jpg


Sorry they are so big. I had my last 4d scan there and i had fab pics but this time im so disappointed :cry: I said he looked too squahed and i couldnt see his face much and i suggested a walk but she just carried on scanning. I got home and i called them straight away and the manager said she would get 2 sonographers to review the pics she called me back saying they think the images are fine! I have to phone her back this morning again as i sent her these pictures and asked her if she thought they were ok!!! I paid £200 for 1 picture i like which is my avatar! The dvd is 10 mins and you can hardly see baby on that either.... i didnt get ANY black and white prints which i was meant to get - Ive just had an awful scan! :cry:
I really hope she will let me go back for a re-scan if she doesnt i dont think there much i can do is there?!




**** UPDATE! ****

The head sonographer called me this morning and she agreed that the pictures are not that good - she said my placenta was in the way so im getting a re-scan on 8th Jan!!!! :happydance: Im so happy!
 
thats just how they look hun i really think they are nice
 
He looks a bit grumpy lol but he's gorgeous! I haven't had a 4d scan done but from all the pics i've seen of them none of them are bad pictures, they're all just different. I don't think you're been unreasonable but I imagine it's easy to build your expectations up of how these pics are gonna look and then be a little disappointed when they're not what you envisaged. But, really, they're adorable! xx
 
I personally think they are fine hun. but its up to you.
Remember baby is alot bigger than it has been and it will be harder to get photos.
xxxx
 
I think they are good! I was told when I went for mine that the pics wouldn't be as clear because there's less room in there. Mine had a squished nose because she was pressed up against my tummy :haha: I think yours are really cute! :) xxx
 
I guess im just comparing this scan to my last -

These were the pictures i got with my first son:


https://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y112/Lil-L/oliversscan3.jpg
https://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y112/Lil-L/4doliver.jpg


I really dont think you can compare the two!!! Maybe a suggested walk would of made a bit of difference to move the baby a bit!
Thanks for the comments though :)
 
i think they become more distorted the bigger the baby gets, mine were very bad, i have front placenta and your could hardly see the baby's face at all
 
i think theyre all fine, better than mine anyway,lol, think it depends on baby and ho theyre laying, mine had placenta, cord and arms in the way and had a grump on so got NO nice piccies either time. I think your are ok, the second ones u added are better, but on the first lot the first and last one are good?? xxx
 
Well the second lot of pictures my first son was 28 weeks gest and when i had the scan for this baby he was 26+5 so i would of thought i would of got the same quality of pictures. Maybe i am being a bit of a moaner then! I just feel dissapointed with the results plus we didnt get the 'full package' that i paid for!!!!
 
They are about as good as I got on first and second attempt, we got the rescan (I think) cos baby just wouldn't wake up so there was no dvd footage. Not a lot they can do when baby just wants to cuddle up close to you and hide his face.

We were given the option of not having the pics and not paying though but decided something was better than nothing, we got to see him twice on the screen and reassurance that he was ok.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,202
Messages
27,141,482
Members
255,677
Latest member
gaiangel
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->