So I read the natural parenting forum, and a girl asked a question about letting kids cry it out. Basically her problem is she doesn't like it, her SIL is staying over Xmas and does let her baby CIO and what should she do?
I said that it would different if her SIL was beating her kids, but this is just a different parenting style and its hard to tell people their way is wrong, and everyone's parenting needs to be respected. Someone else replied saying that, in her opinion, leaving a child to CIO is THE SAME as whacking them with a belt.
CIO is such a touchy subject and I think it's because, from conversations I've had with others and things I've read, there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about it. And I think there are different levels of it, too, I guess.
And there are also a ton of overly dramatic people on the interwebs.
It's not your baby. They're not being harmed (not physically and arguably not even potentially emotionally, depending on the situation). Get over it, is my opinion on that.
Our pediatrician suggested an absolutely unacceptable form of CIO (for me) when my dd was only 2 months old and that just turned me off of CIO in general because at that point (and even now), I had a very strong emotional reaction to my baby crying (I'm sure PPD didn't help). She told me to make sure her needs were met, and then to put her down and walk away and let her cry. Period. There is no way I was going to be able to do that with 1)the kind of person I am (
very high-strung!) and 2) the stubborn baby I had.
I wasn't comfortable with that in any way in our situation. But there are probably baby/parent combos that it would have worked out well for. My emotions wouldn't allow it. I couldn't stand being away from her when she was crying, even if hubby had her. It was a really strong drive for me and I can't explain it. It doesn't mean I think someone else is less of a mother because they don't have that same visceral reaction, though. My husband accused me of being effing insane about it many, many times (thanks, hun, that really helps the PPD
). And yes, I did spend hours and hours and hours rocking her while she screamed at me getting her to sleep
every night until she was about 10 months old and could walk and I could easily distinguish between a cry and a fuss. That's when I became more comfortable with fuss-it-out. I often started trying to get her down around 8.30 and wouldn't get her to sleep enough to put in the crib until 1-2am. And then she'd wake up to eat again around 3-4am. And then I had to get up for work at 7.00am. Walking dead for a year (OMG, why am I doing this again?!
). I probably caused myself a lot of grief doing it the way I did but it was the only thing I was comfortable with and I'll probably do it again if I have another baby with the same personality as dd.
I think
most people who claim CIO really just do fuss it out (FIO). Most people I know who say they do CIO do
not let their babies lie there and cry unattended for hours which is what people get in such a huff over CIO about. Most of them WILL let their babies fuss for a while, though (like we do sometimes now at nap time and like Melissa just said they do with ds). If the fuss turns into a cry, they (I) go tend to them immediately. .