shelx
Mummy to 2 gorgeous boys
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 4,073
- Reaction score
- 0
Did it not come on this week?
The jump was on lol.
Did it not come on this week?
But they were 20/21 and had a 4 year old so were quite a bit youger
Both of them are 23 so not that young imo.
Their house was appalling, no excuse.
But the young couple seem to have learning difficulties! How is that not an excuse!? They didn't even realise that if something was in the girls name then the boy wouldn't have been able to deal with it in the benefit office!
They need support and guidance!
Anyway I'm looking forward to the show when the residents get to speak about how the show has portrayed them.
But the young couple seem to have learning difficulties! How is that not an excuse!? They didn't even realise that if something was in the girls name then the boy wouldn't have been able to deal with it in the benefit office!
They need support and guidance!
Anyway I'm looking forward to the show when the residents get to speak about how the show has portrayed them.
But the young couple seem to have learning difficulties! How is that not an excuse!? They didn't even realise that if something was in the girls name then the boy wouldn't have been able to deal with it in the benefit office!
They need support and guidance!
Anyway I'm looking forward to the show when the residents get to speak about how the show has portrayed them.
It must be a joint claim they have though? X
theres no excuse for a filthy house:S im a sahm with a 4,3 and 8 month old and i manage to do abit of cleaning everyday:/ i dont want my kids living in filth, since they both spend so much time at home a quick clean wouldnt hurt:/ just seems lazy tbh
Obviously if someone has learning disabilitys then it will be much harder for them but it doesnt refer to what type. People with dyslexia for example could be far more intelligant than I am and certainly be able to clean etc so I think saying 'they have learning disabilities' cant excuse everything.
I did say however that the mum looked like she really tried but she simply seemed lost at what to do, there should be much more support for her.
Obviously if someone has learning disabilitys then it will be much harder for them but it doesnt refer to what type. People with dyslexia for example could be far more intelligant than I am and certainly be able to clean etc so I think saying 'they have learning disabilities' cant excuse everything.
I did say however that the mum looked like she really tried but she simply seemed lost at what to do, there should be much more support for her.
also about the food bank situation, I must be stupid then as if it was in my boyfriends name I think I would think I could go and collect it for him. I deal with his will etc so why couldnt I go pick up some food, we live together, have joint accounts etc
Obviously if someone has learning disabilitys then it will be much harder for them but it doesnt refer to what type. People with dyslexia for example could be far more intelligant than I am and certainly be able to clean etc so I think saying 'they have learning disabilities' cant excuse everything.
I did say however that the mum looked like she really tried but she simply seemed lost at what to do, there should be much more support for her.
I used that as an example, one possible reason (that's why I said e.g), my point is there could be a whole load of undelrying reasons that we are not seeing on this show. I think the fact that you say the mum was really trying shows she wants to do better for her kids but she just doesn't know how.
Who said they have learning difficulties? Has that been said anywhere?
Seriously, if they were mindful enough to have kids surely they are mindful enough to keep a clean home or at least clean children.
I really, really see no viable excuse for the state of their kids.