I've been musing about BFing and how my feelings have changed regarding the 'politics' (for want of a better word) of BFing over the past 10 months.
For example, I would have said, to begin with, that there was nothing wrong with expecting a BFing mother to be discrete. But my feelings on that have changed somewhat and I have done some thinking about contexts and why a BFing breast is not the same as a sexual breastand therefore not something that should need to be hidden, and why BFing in public openly is important for increasing BFing rates etc.
One of my biggest mental shifts has been following reading Breast is Not Best on the Analytical Armadillo's blog, and Watch Your Language by Diane Wiessinger. She made me question, why do we tell people of the 'benefits' of BFing rather than describing BFing as the biological norm and more correctly speaking of the risks of FF? Is it the formula companies' advertising working its magic? Is it a commendable impulse to avoid upsetting FFing mothers? Both?
If we talk of the risks of FF and the normalcy of breastmilk for our species, would it do harm by getting us labelled 'breastapo' and other such derogatory terms and therfore ignored, or would it maybe make some women think, provide women making their choice with information? Is there a way back from the current situation to a world where BF is the norm, donated milk available for those who cannot BF, and formula is a very useful substitute used only when real milk is not available, perhaps available on prescription to eliminate the current huge costs to women who need it?
For example, I would have said, to begin with, that there was nothing wrong with expecting a BFing mother to be discrete. But my feelings on that have changed somewhat and I have done some thinking about contexts and why a BFing breast is not the same as a sexual breastand therefore not something that should need to be hidden, and why BFing in public openly is important for increasing BFing rates etc.
One of my biggest mental shifts has been following reading Breast is Not Best on the Analytical Armadillo's blog, and Watch Your Language by Diane Wiessinger. She made me question, why do we tell people of the 'benefits' of BFing rather than describing BFing as the biological norm and more correctly speaking of the risks of FF? Is it the formula companies' advertising working its magic? Is it a commendable impulse to avoid upsetting FFing mothers? Both?
If we talk of the risks of FF and the normalcy of breastmilk for our species, would it do harm by getting us labelled 'breastapo' and other such derogatory terms and therfore ignored, or would it maybe make some women think, provide women making their choice with information? Is there a way back from the current situation to a world where BF is the norm, donated milk available for those who cannot BF, and formula is a very useful substitute used only when real milk is not available, perhaps available on prescription to eliminate the current huge costs to women who need it?