whats the deal with the underdeveloped countries? Formula is expensive, im not sure how people would be paying for them in 3rd world countries? Or was it donated to them? I don't know, there are lots of orphanages and mothers who die there... so I have a hard time believing sending formula there as a donation would hardly be bad?
Sorry, I am not trying to get into a debate about it. But I've seen it mentioned a few times on this site... And im having a hard time making an opinion on the situation without the right info.
One of my co-workers went to south-east asia for 6 weeks to donate her time and medical help to some shelters and orphanages and the state of where she was was appalling.
Basically, way back in the 70's, Nestle employed women to hand out free formula to new mums in India, Africa and Asia. They dressed the women in uniform similar to that of western nurses and made sure the mums got enough formula to feed the babies until their breast milk dried up (the new mums believing it's what all western women do, so they should follow suit if they wanted what's best for their babies). The mums were then trapped with starving newborns, and no way to feed them, so they would end up having to buy a tin of formula (some areas it costs several months wages) and they would have to mix up weaker versions with dirty water in very unsanitary conditions.)
The result? Thousands and thousands of unessercary infant deaths through starvation and infection. Why? So Nestle could line their pockets (I want to insert a 5 letter word here, but shall refrain....) :'(
The boycott is still ongoing, although it has changed slighty to now include
lobbying against their poor labelling of baby food products & to stop them discouraging breastfeeding. (They break just about every W.H.O code their is).
In short, they are lying, deceitful, murdering b*stards whose company should be shut down, but of course, never will be (unless we all vote with our purses of course??)
HTH explain a little bit more xxxx