Thats interesting!
with DS i went 41+5 based on LMP. Based on ov. i would have been 41+2. So i guess even when you know ovulation, all babies develop at different rates. Although, that cycle i ov. like CD 18 whereas with this pregnancy it wasnt until CD 22 ...I only have 10 day LP (generally 32 day cycles)...so that sucks lol will be interesting to see when this one comes htoug! Its weird to think i would be 38 weeks if it were based on LMP.
just wondering... what do your measurements on ultrasound show? I know it doesnt always mean anything but are you measuring closer to you LMP or OV date?
Haha, ultrasound didn't agree with either of those dates lol
[For this pregnancy] I had my first ultrasound at 8+5 (thats according to ov. edd). The ultrasound thought i was 9+3.
So to put that into perspective:
OV = 8+5
ultrasound = 9+3 (5 day difference to ov)
LMP = 10 + 0 (9 day difference to ov, and 4 day difference to ultrasound)
That was 1st tri. When i went back for my 20 week ultrasound (which was actually done at 18 weeks exactly, based on ovulation). It said i was 18 weeks. ...I havn't had any other scans done....tbh though, i dont trust them...when i had my son EDD based on LMP was Aug 23rd. Based on ultrasound it was August 25th, and based on ov. it was August 26th....i didn't have him until September 4th
Ultrasound is a touchy thing. And the more pregnant you get, the less accurate it is. With DS they freaked us out once because the ultrasound said something way different than what we knew...then we figured something wasn't right.it was an ever so small click difference....so just the tech clicking even a cm away can really change dates!
US can also be off in either direction by plus or minus three pounds... For instnace, my little sister told she was going to have 9lb+ baby...yeah was only 5lb &15 oz..
At any rate i think its irrelavent no matter which date you go by, because all babies (even in the same mother) develop at different rates
Some need more time, and some need less.