He shouldn't be labelled a paedophile as thats just not the correct term. I expect his sentence was harsher because of the abduction and though she went willingly with him which almost makes me feel sorry for him, but he was a complete idiot to take her (and a complete idiot to have a relationship with her, of course, if they really loved each other they should have waited until she was 16 and he should have stopped teaching her the moment he felt an attraction), he should have known better so I guess he does deserve the harsher sentence.
A Paedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to children, is it not? Pre pubescent or not, thats a very fine line to draw imo?
I've no idea if the rumours are true that he tried it on with a few girl if the same age before this girl in question but if it is true he obviously has an affection for young girls rather than the 'love story' he's trying to portray to the court.He shouldn't be labelled a paedophile as thats just not the correct term. I expect his sentence was harsher because of the abduction and though she went willingly with him which almost makes me feel sorry for him, but he was a complete idiot to take her (and a complete idiot to have a relationship with her, of course, if they really loved each other they should have waited until she was 16 and he should have stopped teaching her the moment he felt an attraction), he should have known better so I guess he does deserve the harsher sentence.
A Paedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to children, is it not? Pre pubescent or not, thats a very fine line to draw imo?
The term is defined in the DSM as having a sexual attraction to prepubescent children but it is used so readily and frequently in the media that it is often interpreted as referring to children of all ages.
By that definition he isn't a paedophile, but still a child abuser who groomed an underage girl and I find that absolutely disgusting. I'm shocked when I read people trying to defend their relationship as some kind of love story, he is no different to a paedophile in my eyes.
He shouldn't be labelled a paedophile as thats just not the correct term. I expect his sentence was harsher because of the abduction and though she went willingly with him which almost makes me feel sorry for him, but he was a complete idiot to take her (and a complete idiot to have a relationship with her, of course, if they really loved each other they should have waited until she was 16 and he should have stopped teaching her the moment he felt an attraction), he should have known better so I guess he does deserve the harsher sentence.
A Paedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to children, is it not? Pre pubescent or not, thats a very fine line to draw imo?
Anyone read this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...g-plans-wed-pupil-snatched-leaves-prison.html
He shouldn't be labelled a paedophile as thats just not the correct term. I expect his sentence was harsher because of the abduction and though she went willingly with him which almost makes me feel sorry for him, but he was a complete idiot to take her (and a complete idiot to have a relationship with her, of course, if they really loved each other they should have waited until she was 16 and he should have stopped teaching her the moment he felt an attraction), he should have known better so I guess he does deserve the harsher sentence.
A Paedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to children, is it not? Pre pubescent or not, thats a very fine line to draw imo?
As Missy86 said, a paedophile is attracted to prepubescent children, not teenagers.
He shouldn't be labelled a paedophile as thats just not the correct term. I expect his sentence was harsher because of the abduction and though she went willingly with him which almost makes me feel sorry for him, but he was a complete idiot to take her (and a complete idiot to have a relationship with her, of course, if they really loved each other they should have waited until she was 16 and he should have stopped teaching her the moment he felt an attraction), he should have known better so I guess he does deserve the harsher sentence.
A Paedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to children, is it not? Pre pubescent or not, thats a very fine line to draw imo?
As Missy86 said, a paedophile is attracted to prepubescent children, not teenagers.
And what age is pre pubescent then? Surely you can't put an age on that?
I don't mean to sound pedantic but the title of paedophile could well be correct, I know about half of my daughters friends are showing signs of puberty and about half not. Regardless of the 'official' title what he has done is a betrayal of trust and sick and if that were my daughter even 10 years wouldn't seem enough.
This happened in my hometown.
It's his wife I feel the most sorry for.
This happened in my hometown.
It's his wife I feel the most sorry for.
Me too!! Where abouts are you? His family's house is about a 10 minute walk from mine. I think I recognise his brother too!
I to sure about this though to be honest. I think he deserves prison because he did abuse a position of trust, and if he loved her like he said he should've removed himself from the situation, changed schools and waited until she was 16 to begin a relationship. I don't like the label peadophile though if I'm honest, I was sexually active at 14 and once with an older guy, and I never aw it as him being a peaodphile, I still don't (although I think he thought I was older!) but I was very mature and knew what I was doing and I have no bad feelings towards him. I think we'll never know fully whether he is some kind of sexual predator or just a silly naive bloke doing the wrong thing.
It reminded me of a teacher/student relationship at my school, it was a few years before I went there but a teacher fell for a student, and nothing happened, he waited until she left her her a levels and then at 18 they got together and are happily married with children.