A
AppleBlossom
Guest
I assume the only reason the McCann's weren't done for neglect was because they were in Portugal and so technically under Portugese law, which I assume is more tolerant of it?
Not at all - in fact the Portuguese are even stricter on it than we are here ... and it carries a jail sentence if harm has come to a child as a result of them being left alone :
Which may well be why the McCanns stick to this "there is no evidence that Madeleine has come to any harm" stuff.
It's widely believed that the Portuguese didn't prosecute them for neglect because of pressure from the UK not to.
Ahh I see!
How has that not been looked into more!? I find that very worrying.
Basically because the dogs' reactions aren't proof in and of themselves - the dogs are there to pinpoint areas that need to be looked at more closely.
Samples were taken from the car and the clothes etc and sent to the FSS (Forensic Science Service) in Birmingham. Then there was all this confusion and the forensic evidence was declared to be 'inconclusive' and the samples were destroyed by the lab.
Personally I just can't think of any valid reason why a cadaver dog would alert to a wardrobe in the apartment, behind the apartment settee, under a bush on the apartment patio, a T shirt belonging to the missing child, the child's soft toy, a few items of clothing belonging to the child's mother and the back of a hire car not hired until after she had disappeared.... but it's all circumstantial
![]()
she started making up excuses about why the teddy smelt and why the car smelt etc, I mean taking the teddy to work with her which is why it smelt like corpse? Something just doesn't sit right.
Same. I wouldn't take my child's favourite toy into work if I knew I was going to be around corpses. Not exactly hygienic is it? And why would you take it anyway? It's a cuddly toy, not a stapler..?