Thanks Bex. I've been thinking about having this one at the hospital I went to before, and I think today has definitely made me feel like that's a good idea. I guess if I had the same experience before, I wouldn't be disappointed so I'm trying to concentrate on that and I have to remind myself I'm not in London anymore!
Most of my issues are to do with my family history, which would be something for the anomaly scan anyway, so probably not worth a private scan right now. I just don't feel reassured that they know as much as they should, so I know that I'm going to be really painful about asking lots of questions at that one to make sure they are looking at everything that has affected my sister. I also compared my notes when I got back today. Last time under the section about maternal history there was a meaty paragraph about me, listing my height / weight / basic health history, cancer history etc. This one it just said Mother's age = 30 (!)
When we queried stuff, she just kept saying that Kings do a lot of research and that's why they take so many measurements, but at Kings the nasal bone was a key indicator for the NT scan (which had to be double checked at my later scan), but here they didnt even look at it. It's things like that, that make me feel they're not as advanced as they should be. My notes don't even say anything about the placenta. If I hadn't asked I wouldn't know it was anterior again. I guess I just need to sit tight and wait for the bloods to come back, keep my fingers crossed that they're okay and focus on my next appointment.
Snow - hope OH is looking after you. 2.5mm - 3.5mm isn't necessarily large. When I've looked before, measurements over 3.5mm were the most concerning and almost all babies with measurements within the range yours is, are fine. Keep positive honey xx