To me and this again is not posted to be rude to anyone so please dont be offended!
I think if its a boy or girl it doesnt make a diff too me, when i saw the photo on the other thread i think it looked dirty, wrong even abit perverted!
I saw it as a JOKE, have u ever seen the show Little Britain, well the photo reminded me of the comedy part "BITTY" a adult still breast feeding of his mother!
I know that boy isnt a adult but how much longer does she plan to go on feeding him? I wonder if his friends at school saw this what they would think of this behaviour? Maybe it could lead to bulling?
I also think when i picture breast feeding i imagine a newborn baby drinking milk a natural source from the mother cos thats what are breasts are made to do, but anything over 2yrs old i dont see that natural anymore!
Be really honest when someone says the words breast feeding do u really picture a 5yr old or a baby?
Sorry to be so blunt but i just see it unessary, if this was normal behaviour than surely we wouldnt eat we would still be drinking milk from our mothers!
Amazing article someone put in my thread in the BFing section Very lovely I doubt anyone can say the mother is wrong for giving her child comfort.
https://dianaibclc.com/2012/05/11/yes-shes-4-and-yes-shes-still-breastfeeding/#comment-687
I think there would be a horrible reaction, but most people would focus on the woman's size. How dare someone put an OBESE woman on the cover of a magazine?! People are just shallow. I think the actual backlash might be worse, because it would be easier for people to talk about how stupid this woman must be, because she's not a thin 26 year old with perky little breasts.
The Time picture bothers me because it is so unnatural and meant to get a reaction. This one doesn't bother me at all - I find it heartwarming and loving.
Also, I keep hearing how this little boy is "homeschooled," but he's THREE. I could never consider a three year old "homeschooled" because three year old's don't generally go to school! Very, very low income three year olds might go to head start, and some might go to a daycare type preschool - but i might as well consider both my 4 year old and baby homeschooled as I stay at home and teach them things all day.
I think there would be a horrible reaction, but most people would focus on the woman's size. How dare someone put an OBESE woman on the cover of a magazine?! People are just shallow. I think the actual backlash might be worse, because it would be easier for people to talk about how stupid this woman must be, because she's not a thin 26 year old with perky little breasts.
The Time picture bothers me because it is so unnatural and meant to get a reaction. This one doesn't bother me at all - I find it heartwarming and loving.
Also, I keep hearing how this little boy is "homeschooled," but he's THREE. I could never consider a three year old "homeschooled" because three year old's don't generally go to school! Very, very low income three year olds might go to head start, and some might go to a daycare type preschool - but i might as well consider both my 4 year old and baby homeschooled as I stay at home and teach them things all day.
Andella, I was just getting ready to say that there would be so many comments attacking this worman's SIZE that everyone would forget what the article was actually about in the first place.
Amazing article someone put in my thread in the BFing section Very lovely I doubt anyone can say the mother is wrong for giving her child comfort.
https://dianaibclc.com/2012/05/11/yes-shes-4-and-yes-shes-still-breastfeeding/#comment-687
what about this then
https://moms.today.msnbc.msn.com/_n...-of-dad-feeding-baby-turns-controversial?lite
I think its a lovely picture but I do agree with some of the others that say the picture would probably be ridiculed because of the mother's weight.