Midnight_Fairy
New baby J
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 44,234
- Reaction score
- 5
I bet its none
but Diana wasn't queen (only a princess by marriage) so it wasn't an offical royal name really - same way Camilla isn't royal or Kate and Pippa but once Kate becomes queen then Catherine will go into the royal name pool again
but Diana wasn't queen (only a princess by marriage) so it wasn't an offical royal name really - same way Camilla isn't royal or Kate and Pippa but once Kate becomes queen then Catherine will go into the royal name pool again
It doesn't matter because she married into the royal family and is the mother of the princes, (which makes it slightly different to someone like Camilla), and her name is now part of the royal family. Charles doesn't have to be King to make his name royal, that's not how it works - they just need to be a significant part of the royal family.
(Also Catherine already is a royal name, nothing to do with Kate Middleton, it was before).
Charles doesn't have to be because hes blood and titled, having a child to a future king does not make you name royal though many kings where married and had children with multiple wives they didn't become royal names and I said clearly 'will be in the royal name pool AGAIN'
Charles doesn't have to be because hes blood and titled, having a child to a future king does not make you name royal though many kings where married and had children with multiple wives they didn't become royal names and I said clearly 'will be in the royal name pool AGAIN'
Diana was the Princess of Wales, Camilla is the Duchess of Cornwall, there's a big difference. Not only that but she had royal heritage before she married Charles, just look it up.
Also, once a name is in the 'royal pool' as you call it, it's a royal name, it doesn't become 'un-royal'...
but it becomes unpopular and falls out of use
you trying to pick an argument for absolutely no reason so im just going to have a break
Im a little confused here - what exactly makes a name 'royal'? Just that it has been used by the royal family? And if thats the case, how long does JJKB think it goes before it becomes 'unpopular?' Im sure there's no official guideline. So Im confused as to where they'd draw the line.
Also - by 'royal names' here are we only talking about royal to the UK? Because
Madeleine for example is the name of the Princess and future Queen of Sweden, but that doesn't make it royal to England does it?
Since diana came into the family, doesn't it make a royal name (and I thought she was somewhat part of the royal family . Also, why they care how they name their child if they aren't officially "royal" themselvesI understand that shes his mother but its not a royal name
I think it would get middle name at most