In the UK..
35% of babies are BF at 1 week
21% at 6 weeks
7% at 4 months
3% at 5 months
so terrible.
Oh my god Its amazing that so many FF mums feel like they are bullied about BF and in the minority, when the BFing rates are so shockingly low! At 14 months and still breastfeeding I must be one of about 0.142422%! This country sucks.
Sounds like your NHS trust is a bit shit in materntiy services then
Just because we're proud of the fact that we've bf for 6 months, 12 months, 14 months, 31 months etc, doesn't mean we're rubbing it in your face :\ It was just a joke lou made jeez.
This thread is quite distressing. There is so much misinformation in it!
There ARE MORE risks involved with FF...that is why breast is best (trace elements, vitamins, antibodies for the digestive system, the perfect ingredients to make antibodies for ANY other pathogen the mother has come into contact with) and people who chose to FF NEED to be aware of the risks or they are not well informed. Be it risks about preparation, not cuddling while feeding (babies NEED skin to skin - so stroking, tickling etc) or making eye contact etc. BF is very difficult to do 'wrong' so is therefore, by default, more safe. ((and for the record - if a baby is born at 'term', so 37+ weeks, it has a store of brown fat to keep it going while breast feeding is established...typically up to a week...but so few people share this info and scare new mums with notions about babies starving to death if they don't feed NOW etc))
It is incredibley sad to hear about women who try and desperately WANT to BF, but as more and more mothers try and have success, more will be able to share help with others.
I wish evey town had a group like the one I have - it is a LLL and wasn't set up when I started out, but now it has an amazing core of about 15 women who are dedicated to HELPING, not belittling or showing off, just helping.
Ahhh you were referring to the 'special snowflakes' comment. It was clearly sarcasm! Thought that was pretty obvious. ESPECIALLY the smug smiley, you are being waaaay over sensitive.
Aren't all mothers-to-be, given the NHS 'The Pregnancy Book' at their booking in? We get one here anyway. Page 115-119 is all about formula feeding, how to make bottles safely, how to store them, ingredients, risks, and so on
There is going to be a MW about from the first feed anyway. Most people try and BF the first few days and the baby isnt going to starve in 1 day from not getting much from the breast. If they wish to move on from FF then you see a MW or HV a lot in the first few weeks.
There is going to be a MW about from the first feed anyway. Most people try and BF the first few days and the baby isnt going to starve in 1 day from not getting much from the breast. If they wish to move on from FF then you see a MW or HV a lot in the first few weeks.
This might be true in your experience but not in mine. Morgan I saw a mw twice and hv when I went to the clinic once every 2-3 weeks. Naomi-Mae very similar. Honey I saw no one (different I know but I had still give birth). Kyasie Blossom I had an emergency section was discharged 3 days post delivery and first saw a mw 11 days post delivery and never saw a hv, and Riley Rae nearly five months on and I have seen no one. Just thought you might like to know the different experiences that are out there (sorry if someone else has said, not read all the way through yet)
Honestly I am not sure if I am not writing this clearly or if there is some other issue. As far as I can see we are talking about just that- the availablity of information about FF. As I have said upteen times, my Health Board (meaning MWs, HV etc) openly talk about FF if they are asked. They discuss storage, making up bottles etc. I have also heard them suggesting that people look to hungry baby milk etc. So the information you say people want is available if needed from my Health Board and is not restricted. This is surely the case for all information- it is there if you need it. As I said already, I cannot believe this is the only one where this is the case.
I find it interesting the people want to be told what to do regarding FF but as a society there is a constant outcry when the government issue guidelines regarding parenting and raising children. I do think that if you are planning to FF from the get go then it is your responsibility to educate yourself about how to do it before baby arrives. Surely that is the case about all aspects of parenting? Guidelines change over time and it has to be our responsibility to make sure we are educated about what is current. I do not know anyone IRL who was not offered NHS ante-natal classes or who did not get the Ready, Steady, Baby book. At the ante-natal classes FF was discussed and it wasn't looked down at, nor was it looked down upon subsequently.
First bit in bold - err Im not sure what you mean about that but no, no other issue apart from I think it is very wrong that information is restricted.
Second bit - there was a post (I think the OP) stating that the HV had been told she wasnt allowed to discuss more than very basic info re: FF and was only allowed to discuss it when asked and she had an opinion on which milk the child would be better on from a health POV and wasnt allowed to discuss it with the mum!!!!! The whole point of this thread was about the restriction of information!
Third bit - Not all mums plan to FF and stock up on BF info (like me) and then have to switch to FF unexpectedly and mightnt have even read the Pregnancy Book section about FF because they never expected to need it (like me). So what's the harm, say when the the MW comes to visit on the day of discharge or on a postnatal check and the mum asks the HV if she is doing something right with regards to bottle feeding. How rubbish would it be if the HV is not allowed to answer that mum's query? Let's not forget how scary and horrible being a new mum can be, it doesnt matter how much you research beforehand, the first few days are awful and a bit of reassurance and info from a friendly face of a HCP about your decision to FF cant harm. Or on a HV visit when you have a baby with reflux or whatever and you think changing milk may help but you have no clue which one is the best and from that HCPs experience they believe a certain milk might be better in the best interests of the child (and of course telling them to go to the GP)?
I really dont understand why people have a problem with people accessing information from health professionals about FF. That's what this issue comes down to. Like I keep repeating, we dont want promotional posters, we dont want peer support workers, we dont want workshops. All we are in support of is to have the ability to ask questions from the HCPs involved in our care about FF and not have restrictions about the type of information available (like I said discussing types of milk in certain situations rather than brands).
I feel I am saying the same thing over and over again hence the comment about some other problem. I have answered in response to the lack of information over and over again but here goes once again.
Where we stay, there is NO problem getting information about FF from the Health Board and its employees. I have already given umpteem examples of when this has happened when my daughter was a baby. I was responding to the initial post to say that restriction of information is not the case across the country. The written information was given out in several forms by the health board (NHS Lothian) and the HVs/MWs were willing to discuss it. I am not sure how much more anyone could be asked for.
Wow, our MW came on day 1, 7 and 14 and that was it, then on day 16 the HV came. xxThere is going to be a MW about from the first feed anyway. Most people try and BF the first few days and the baby isnt going to starve in 1 day from not getting much from the breast. If they wish to move on from FF then you see a MW or HV a lot in the first few weeks.
This might be true in your experience but not in mine. Morgan I saw a mw twice and hv when I went to the clinic once every 2-3 weeks. Naomi-Mae very similar. Honey I saw no one (different I know but I had still give birth). Kyasie Blossom I had an emergency section was discharged 3 days post delivery and first saw a mw 11 days post delivery and never saw a hv, and Riley Rae nearly five months on and I have seen no one. Just thought you might like to know the different experiences that are out there (sorry if someone else has said, not read all the way through yet)
Really? A mw came out everyday for the first 4 days then every 2nd til day 10. After that hv came out maybe 3 times a week for 2 more weeks. We seen them liads, was a pain tbh lol.
Ahhh you were referring to the 'special snowflakes' comment. It was clearly sarcasm! Thought that was pretty obvious. ESPECIALLY the smug smiley, you are being waaaay over sensitive.
Hmmm. Yes I am, because I went through utter hell and Im still extremely scarred over the experience. I would have thought my first post on this thread would have indicated that and made people realise there may be a reason behind why Im so against the judgement FFers do get (and we do get judged whether you believe it or not!), even if you cant offer the support and hugs you've given to other mums on this thread who are struggling to come to terms with switching to FF. Perhaps when Im further away from what happened and have come to terms with it, I will chortle along with such 'jokes' and wont wish as desperately as I do now that I was as lucky as you are.
Perhaps you'd be suprised to realise I judge myself the most for the FF? I hate myself for failing my child. I couldnt go into labour naturally, I couldnt give birth naturally, I cant feed my child naturally. You wouldnt know how much that hurts unless you'd been through it yourself.
And Im out of here. Im going to cuddle my formula fed and much loved daughter. Thankfully she doesnt judge me on how I feed her.
*clicks unsubscribe*