That guideline thing about giving a gift that is approx what the meal cost is a very flawed one. It has always kind of bugged me because it doesn't really make sense.
First of all, what about the fact that many guests travel to attend a wedding? The costs of airfare, hotel, car rental, etc should be considered. Their presence truly is their "present" and it probably cost far more than the cost of their plate at the wedding.
Also, does that mean that someone who chose to put on an intimate, small-scale, home-cooked dinner somehow deserves less than someone who put on a fancy catered event?
The dollar value of the plate is a very silly measure and certainly shouldn't be used to dictate cash amounts. That's just crass.
This is one where I think common sense and courtesy needs to kick the silly etiquette guide out the window. It also goes to show just how vile and f-ed up the whole wedding industry is. I absolutely agree that the shocking spoiled bratty behaviour seems to be more and more common. When spending upwards of $30k (on average, here in Canada) on one evening has become the norm, we probably shouldn't be too surprised that perspective gets lost.
I always thought that traditionally gift giving at a wedding was about helping the young couple start off there new lives. That's why traditionally u would receive homeware. Cash gifts have only come about due to more modern settings. Eg most couple have already started a home and even have families or be of an older generation iykwim so the traditional gift of helping the couple start a new life as such is void. So really there is no rule about 'covering your plate' so 2 speak x
that is shocking, if it was me thought id send her a message back and say that id meant to put in more and must have miss counted and then ask her to post the $100 back and id send a cheque for $400
on receiving my money back id never speak to her again cheeky cow. but im a vindictive mare and ther eis no way id let her keep my hard earned money when she didnt even appreiciate it
I've never heard of that! What does it mean exactly....I always thought that traditionally gift giving at a wedding was about helping the young couple start off there new lives. That's why traditionally u would receive homeware. Cash gifts have only come about due to more modern settings. Eg most couple have already started a home and even have families or be of an older generation iykwim so the traditional gift of helping the couple start a new life as such is void. So really there is no rule about 'covering your plate' so 2 speak x
Exactly, it was all about something for your bottom draw originally (that phrase still makes me giggle)
I've never heard of that! What does it mean exactly....I always thought that traditionally gift giving at a wedding was about helping the young couple start off there new lives. That's why traditionally u would receive homeware. Cash gifts have only come about due to more modern settings. Eg most couple have already started a home and even have families or be of an older generation iykwim so the traditional gift of helping the couple start a new life as such is void. So really there is no rule about 'covering your plate' so 2 speak x
Exactly, it was all about something for your bottom draw originally (that phrase still makes me giggle)
It always amazes me when anybody thinks it's appropriate to say anything other than, "Oh thank you so much, that's really kind of you/it will look lovely in.../we're saving for a..." when receiving a gift! I understand that in some communities it may be usual to give a gift equal to the cost of your place at the wedding, but it is surely also good etiquette not to point it out if somebody can't afford to do so, or doesn't for any other reason. It's like if somebody farts in public, it's rude to do it but it's ruder still to point out who did it .