I have read a lot of conflicting reports on what the victim was wearing and therefore how they identified him as a soldier. I just read the report of the lady who spoke to the attackers and she says that he wore nothing that could have identified him as a soldier, plus on the pictures of him he is clearly in black... whereas I originally read he was wearing a white Help for Heroes t-shirt and a camo backpack
https://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/22/woolwich-first-person-account
he has been identified as a soldier but no names are being released due to respect for the family.
No soldier in the country is allowed to walk amongst civilians whilst in uniform now. someone in the office today isn't allowed to travel home tonight as he has no civilian clothes with him unless he is escorted home.![]()
It has been common practice to not wear uniform outside of the workplace in London since the Olympics (although most defy it, I'm assuming they wont be able to now) they are allowed to drive home with their uniforms on (here). It's quite sad though, it wasn't that long ago that they were trying to encourage soldiers to wear their uniforms in the community as a show of pride and now there are signs everywhere saying not to.
I'm not sure what he was wearing but it has been confirmed he was a solider, his family have been informed and he will be named later today.