So, you ladies are going probably going to want to claw my eye's out after this post, but I was bored and had done a dollar store cheapie a little while ago that I could of swore I could see the faintest line on, but it was too faint to get it show on the camera, I tried. So, with my curiousity peaked and sure I could see a second line, I thought I would run a second experiment like I had done before on with test's that I thought I saw squinters on. Basically, it's when you take apart two PT's remove the dye strip from one, put it into the other test, in effect "doubling' the amount of dye in the test, some women have used this method with success, and gone on later to get obvious lines a few days later without doubling the dye. The first time I did it, I used dye from an OPK thinking it was the same and got two lines, well when someone brought it up, I decided they were probably right and just to be on the safe side, I would try again with PT dye and see if it happened again, it did not. some of the dye stuck, but it looked really weird and like a dye run or a really bad evap, not at all like a true positive. So, tonight, after thinking I had seen a squinter on the DG test, I decided to do another one using this method just to see what would happen. This is the result: I'm in shock. This is not the result I got the last time I did this using PT dye for the experiment. I know the results are not in anyway conclusive of anything, and don't really mean anything, but it is interesting to me that it did not cause a true line the last time and for some reason this time it did? Not only that, but I have seen lots of posts of other ladies doing this same thing after getting a super squinter, only to find out within the week that they actually were pregnant and get a true BFP if they had used PT dye when running the doubling process. I'm intrigued.