Emum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 952
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi christiana! I tried to reply to you this morning but the little one had other ideas.
I've never had anything like what you've been told suggested to me, nor have the doctors ever been concerned when I was pregnant about where in the uterus the baby was implanted. The only vaguely relevant thing I can think of was when was scanned after the last miscarriage the uterine lining was 1.5mm thicker on the left side of the heart than the right. But even then, it wasn't suggested that was significant, it was just noted on the scan report.
As you know you can carry a healthy child and presumably your uterus didn't suddenly change shape or direction after you had her, I'd be inclined not to worry about it any more! GL.
I've never had anything like what you've been told suggested to me, nor have the doctors ever been concerned when I was pregnant about where in the uterus the baby was implanted. The only vaguely relevant thing I can think of was when was scanned after the last miscarriage the uterine lining was 1.5mm thicker on the left side of the heart than the right. But even then, it wasn't suggested that was significant, it was just noted on the scan report.
As you know you can carry a healthy child and presumably your uterus didn't suddenly change shape or direction after you had her, I'd be inclined not to worry about it any more! GL.