LoraLoo
Pregnant with a Rainbow
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 17,119
- Reaction score
- 20
Formula is fine but its no way just as good. idk why people say it is?!
Nor me Im amazed this thread is still going
Formula is fine but its no way just as good. idk why people say it is?!
Im sorry but you cant say ff is not nutritional its been carefully put together to be just as nutitional...
Im sorry but you cant say ff is not nutritional its been carefully put together to be just as nutitional...
almost...
Im sorry but you cant say ff is not nutritional its been carefully put together to be just as nutitional...
almost...
nowhere near imo, and yes ive FF and BF.
Yes well vitamin D isnt really an issue unless you never take your LO outside
Formula does its job. It keeps a baby alive and growing but thats about it. I won't rattle off the benefits of breastmilk because I'm sure everyone knows them but its not just about basic nutrition and people forget there's lots of benefits for mum too, not just the baby.
Im sorry but you cant say ff is not nutritional its been carefully put together to be just as nutitional...
almost...
nowhere near imo, and yes ive FF and BF.
i dunno...with the technology and science that goes into making formula its not as far away from BM as people thing. infact there are things in formula that there isnt enough of it breast milk! (like vitamin d for example)
and ive done both BF and FF too. so im not bothered either way on the whole BF vs FF debate.
As coeliac who has to take all my food with me when I go into labour, I agree!! xxRegarding the "hospitals feed patients, babies are patients too" argument, the way I see it is that the NHS provides basic food for patients. They don't usually need to provide for babies because breastmilk is the normal food for babies (by which I mean biological norm). Anything other than the norm, i.e. formula, should be provided by the parents, just as patients with special dietary requirements (cultural, ethical or medical) often have to provide their own food.
I just don't get why people have this sense of entitlement that the hospital should give them this and that. As I said on pg 42, yes, formula should be there if the mommy wants to breastfeed but isn't able to once she has the baby, but if you know before you have the baby that you want to FF, then you should bring your formula and bottles to hospital to feed YOUR baby.
^ If its not hospitals it's some other public service.. police, schools, even benefits
Regarding the "hospitals feed patients, babies are patients too" argument, the way I see it is that the NHS provides basic food for patients. They don't usually need to provide for babies because breastmilk is the normal food for babies (by which I mean biological norm). Anything other than the norm, i.e. formula, should be provided by the parents, just as patients with special dietary requirements (cultural, ethical or medical) often have to provide their own food.
I just don't get why people have this sense of entitlement that the hospital should give them this and that. As I said on pg 42, yes, formula should be there if the mommy wants to breastfeed but isn't able to once she has the baby, but if you know before you have the baby that you want to FF, then you should bring your formula and bottles to hospital to feed YOUR baby.
^ If its not hospitals it's some other public service.. police, schools, even benefits
EXACTLY both of these statements
This is what I meant to say but put in better words
i dunno...with the technology and science that goes into making formula its not as far away from BM as people thing. infact there are things in formula that there isnt enough of it breast milk! (like vitamin d for example)
and ive done both BF and FF too. so im not bothered either way on the whole BF vs FF debate.
It's nowhere near the same despite what the formula companies would have us believe, have a quick look at https://www.bellybelly.com.au/forums/whatsinbreastmilk.pdf if you want to be amazed.