Kate McCann releasing a book...

[amandad192]

If they weren't guilty of anything they could free up a few hours of their very busy media-driven lives and do a lie detector test to exonerate themselves. Simple. But they won't. I wonder why?

Just in case the lie detector test is "wrong." They're not 100% you know.

Did I hit a nerve? No need to be so abrupt Anyway, I'm well aware of this. But why say you're going to do one then point blank refuse when offered? Because they're liars.

Woooo, I think you misinterpreted my tone. I think they are guilty as I've said before. I was being sarcastic.

 

[Samemka]

If they weren't guilty of anything they could free up a few hours of their very busy media-driven lives and do a lie detector test to exonerate themselves. Simple. But they won't. I wonder why?

Just in case the lie detector test is "wrong." They're not 100% you know.

Did I hit a nerve? No need to be so abrupt Anyway, I'm well aware of this. But why say you're going to do one then point blank refuse when offered? Because they're liars.

Or they have decided that as they are innocent why should they have to do it? They will know full well that if they pass people will still say they were guilty and that the test was wrong. Maybe they don't feel the need to prove themselves?

Given that it is money donated in good faith which has enabled Kate to give up her job, hire expensive lawyers, pay off their mortgage....I think there's a very good reason for them to prove themselves.

They 'seemed' willing to do one when they suggested it - so if they didn't want people going on about it maybe they shouldn't offer & then take it back.

 

[Samemka]

Watching the Late Late show. Few things....(lol)

What's Kate talking about when she says she couldn't make Madeleine out, she looked at the pillow etc etc - in all the pictures I've seen her bed was made near perfectly?

They said it was four hours before the 'criminal police' came - yet in less than 2 hours the story has broken in the UK? Right.

Kate says 'I'm not lying about that' (the shutters being open) - practically admitting she's lying about something else.

Gerry said he lowered the shutter and then went to see if you can open it outside....come off it. If you KNEW you'd left your shutters shut you wouldn't need to close it & go to see if you can open it from the outside, you'd KNOW an intruder must have done it.

When the presenter is questioning them, I have to say Kate sits there looking upset. Gerry sits there with a smug SMILE on his face. Ugh. Someone please smack him!

Also, when Kate gets asked something - like about cuddle cat, Gerry has to interject. I honestly get the impression he is scared of her saying too much, or he is so 'sure' of his watertight story he just feels he can take over.

The presenter asks them about what they'd say to people who suspect they have something to do with it, and Gerry says 'read the book'. Smug git. I honestly think they know there's nothing left to tie them to anything, and so they are now going on sympathy. It was interesting when the dogs were mentioned & Gerry said how they have to be used with forensic evidence too......so he's dismissing the fact they found anything because there was no forensic evidence other than what the dogs picked up on.....that's his answer. He doesn't have to explain ANYTHING because he can just say 'they found nothing' - no Gerry, they found something, I just fear you hid it too well.

 

[Quackquack99]

Apparently the Mccann's have asked for conspiracy thoeries sites to be closed. But surely we don't know for sure that Madeleine was abducted, so why would any other theory be wrong when there isn't sufficient evidence to suggest an abduction? One other thing that's bothering me is that the portuguese police are blasted for their take on the case. But I feel sorry for them as they weren't allowed to follow up on anything other than the abduction lead. Maybe we would have some answers by now

 

[purpledahlia]

But i said it before, WHY have FOUR expensive top lawyers, when youve not even been arrested?? usually people get lawyers once they are arrested and theres a trial. not for no reason. the lawyers must know..

 

[Samemka]

But i said it before, WHY have FOUR expensive top lawyers, when youve not even been arrested?? usually people get lawyers once they are arrested and theres a trial. not for no reason. the lawyers must know..

I don't know but we'll have a lawyer (or 4) after us soon!

 

[Jem_x3]

If they weren't guilty of anything they could free up a few hours of their very busy media-driven lives and do a lie detector test to exonerate themselves. Simple. But they won't. I wonder why?

Just in case the lie detector test is "wrong." They're not 100% you know.

Did I hit a nerve? No need to be so abrupt Anyway, I'm well aware of this. But why say you're going to do one then point blank refuse when offered? Because they're liars.

Woooo, I think you misinterpreted my tone. I think they are guilty as I've said before. I was being sarcastic.

My bad. Sorry I totally thought you were one of the people sticking up for the McCanns and you were trying to make me look stupid. Also it's that time of the month.

 

[Tasha]

Apparently the Mccann's have asked for conspiracy thoeries sites to be closed. But surely we don't know for sure that Madeleine was abducted, so why would any other theory be wrong when there isn't sufficient evidence to suggest an abduction? One other thing that's bothering me is that the portuguese police are blasted for their take on the case. But I feel sorry for them as they weren't allowed to follow up on anything other than the abduction lead. Maybe we would have some answers by now

Why should they get special treatment? I cant believe they think they can control what is on the internet. What happened to freedom of speech?

 

[TattiesMum]

Apparently the Mccann's have asked for conspiracy thoeries sites to be closed. But surely we don't know for sure that Madeleine was abducted, so why would any other theory be wrong when there isn't sufficient evidence to suggest an abduction? One other thing that's bothering me is that the portuguese police are blasted for their take on the case. But I feel sorry for them as they weren't allowed to follow up on anything other than the abduction lead. Maybe we would have some answers by now

There is a great video of Gerry being interviewed after the 1st court case about the book, where he keeps on repeating that "A thesis without evidence is meaningless " .... with no apparent awareness that this applies more to their claims of abduction than Sn Amaral's theory


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbpJeioLQHE&feature=player_embedded


Be warned ... you may find yourself screaming at the computer! LOL

 

[Quackquack99]

Apparently the Mccann's have asked for conspiracy thoeries sites to be closed. But surely we don't know for sure that Madeleine was abducted, so why would any other theory be wrong when there isn't sufficient evidence to suggest an abduction? One other thing that's bothering me is that the portuguese police are blasted for their take on the case. But I feel sorry for them as they weren't allowed to follow up on anything other than the abduction lead. Maybe we would have some answers by now

Why should they get special treatment? I cant believe they think they can control what is on the internet. What happened to freedom of speech?

The internet is a major source of information as I'm sure this thread itself has changed the views of a few people. Myself included. I guess they don't want their followers, the people who are funding their lawyers etc to turn against them

 

[amandad192]

If they weren't guilty of anything they could free up a few hours of their very busy media-driven lives and do a lie detector test to exonerate themselves. Simple. But they won't. I wonder why?

Just in case the lie detector test is "wrong." They're not 100% you know.

Did I hit a nerve? No need to be so abrupt Anyway, I'm well aware of this. But why say you're going to do one then point blank refuse when offered? Because they're liars.

Woooo, I think you misinterpreted my tone. I think they are guilty as I've said before. I was being sarcastic.

My bad. Sorry I totally thought you were one of the people sticking up for the McCanns and you were trying to make me look stupid. Also it's that time of the month.

Lol, no worries. I should have made it more obvious that I was joking...I thought the "wrong" would give it away.

The day I stick up for the mccanns will be the day I leave my son alone in a foreign country when he isn't old enough to look after himself. Even if it were to be proved Maddie was abducted..it's still their fault for allowing the oppurtunity.

 

[buttonnose82]

Apparently the Mccann's have asked for conspiracy thoeries sites to be closed. But surely we don't know for sure that Madeleine was abducted, so why would any other theory be wrong when there isn't sufficient evidence to suggest an abduction? One other thing that's bothering me is that the portuguese police are blasted for their take on the case. But I feel sorry for them as they weren't allowed to follow up on anything other than the abduction lead. Maybe we would have some answers by now

Why should they get special treatment? I cant believe they think they can control what is on the internet. What happened to freedom of speech?

The internet is a major source of information as I'm sure this thread itself has changed the views of a few people. Myself included. I guess they don't want their followers, the people who are funding their lawyers etc to turn against them

I am guessing that with so much 'info' out there it means that *IF* it did ever go too trial it could never be classed as a fair trial, jury members could very well have been influenced on a decision before they even get too court and hear evidence

 

[purpledahlia]

TM that video is really good. Eye opening for anyone whos not read any of the links.. (i have.. but considering putting that video on my fb!)

 

[buttonnose82]

so many people seem too be judging them on they way they act, what they have & haven't done etc .... when in reality, none of us know what they have been told to say/do by lawyers and none of us know how we would act in their shoes ..... just a thought

 

[LoraLoo]

so many people seem too be judging them on they way they act, what they have & haven't done etc .... when in reality, none of us know what they have been told to say/do by lawyers and none of us know how we would act in their shoes ..... just a thought

I dont think people are JUST going on that, there are facts there, police reports and so on. Of course, nobody knows for sure how we would act in there situation but Im sure the majority have been in a position where our child has wandered off for a moment, for eg, and we know the sheer panic and hysteria, so we can imagine hat it would be like if we thought our child had been abducted in a foreign country

 

[TattiesMum]

so many people seem too be judging them on they way they act, what they have & haven't done etc .... when in reality, none of us know what they have been told to say/do by lawyers and none of us know how we would act in their shoes ..... just a thought

That's true ... but the behavioural stuff has nothing to do with why I believe what I do :

That's based on the dogs, the 15 out of 20 DNA markers from the boot and the complete lack of any evidence of abduction

 

[Char&Bump-x]

It's really beginning to bug me that the people who come on and say they believe the McCanns, and that we are heartless etc for not believing them have no reason WHY they believe them. The only thing pointing to abduction is the McCann's words. On the other hand there IS evidence of other theories, yet we're heartless to listen to that evidence.

Perhaps the next person to post who does believe them could explain why?

 

[Midnight_Fairy]

It's really beginning to bug me that the people who come on and say they believe the McCanns, and that we are heartless etc for not believing them have no reason WHY they believe them. The only thing pointing to abduction is the McCann's words. On the other hand there IS evidence of other theories, yet we're heartless to listen to that evidence.

Perhaps the next person to post who does believe them could explain why?

I agree, did the person who had "valid" links (not news papers) actually post them...

 

[buttonnose82]

I believe the McCann's and have never said anyone that doesn't believe them is heartless

I believe them because I go on my gut instinct and also I don't believe they have anything too gain by lying. I understand that there is alot of 'evidence' that points to them being involved but I don't personally feel the 'evidence' is valid enough for me too believe they did it.

sorry can't post more right now as baby crying ..... well try come back though

 

[Nut_Shake]

It's really beginning to bug me that the people who come on and say they believe the McCanns, and that we are heartless etc for not believing them have no reason WHY they believe them. The only thing pointing to abduction is the McCann's words. On the other hand there IS evidence of other theories, yet we're heartless to listen to that evidence.

Perhaps the next person to post who does believe them could explain why?

Coudln't agree more. Its not a problem if people want to air their views, but just to randomly pop in and say 'I believe them, you're all wrong' then not have anything else to add to the thread is a bit pointless really. Id love to see some facts pointing towards an abductor as so far i've not been able to find any. (Im not being sarcastic btw, i actually would like to know if there are any!)