- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 6,140
- Reaction score
- 0
Bush was a liar, and put fear among people when it wasn't needed. He would bang on about the people having weapons off mass distruction, where did they exactly have these? That killers bee were coming! And god knows what else to scare the people into thinking they were always a target, that terrorists attacks would take place any second, he really IMO ever had a clue. Like taking a holiday when they had been warning about terrorists attacks and then when told he sits and still carries on reading a story to the children at the elementry school, my god he looked so concerned aswell. I just feel you cannot blame the one person being sooley responsable for all the attacks, more attacks will happen but who will they blame now he is dead and who will become the figure head
A. Bush didn't lie about anything. He had poor intel- just like Obama had good intel in this situation.
B. Saddam DID have WMDs, it was clearly established in the past, but when you give someone a heads up(Thank you UN) then they move them. I would encourage you took look up the book Demon in the Freezer which touches on this briefly as well as the Russians having the same thing and doing the same thing- hiding them. Saddam only used WMD on Kurds.... Gee, where would we get that idea that he had WMD? I know, because he did have them and it was established by his past history and UN inspectors before we went in.
C.Should he have stood up and screamed," Oh shit, the WTC is crumbling.. run everything.. run!".... what was he to have done.. there was nothing to do. This is one of the arguments that people make that make no sense at all.
D. Bin Laden was NOT a figurehead until AFTER 09/11 and he clearly took credit for the attack. He BECAME a figurehead when he was on the run for his life.. he clearly had input on the attacks and now they are saying he was still involved in implementation of attacks.
Again, these aren't factual.
great post!!! .